Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29982227›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2018

Predictive Ability of Novel Cardiac Biomarkers ST2, Galectin-3, and NT-ProBNP Before Cardiac Surgery.

Sai Polineni, Devin M Parker, Shama S Alam, Heather Thiessen-Philbrook, Eric McArthur, Anthony W DiScipio, David J Malenka, Chirag R Parikh, Amit X Garg, Jeremiah R Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sai PolineniThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH.
Devin M ParkerThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH.
Shama S AlamThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH.
Heather Thiessen-PhilbrookProgram of Applied Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Eric McArthurInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ontario, Canada.
Anthony W DiScipioDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
David J MalenkaDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
Chirag R ParikhProgram of Applied Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Amit X GargInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ontario, Canada.
Jeremiah R BrownThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH jbrown@dartmouth.edu.

Funding

Novel Biomarkers to Predict Readmission in Pediatric and Adult Heart SurgeryR01HL119664 · NHLBI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI BROWN, JEREMIAH R · 2014 to 2017
$3.2M
Information Extraction from EMRs to Predict Readmission following Acute Myocardial InfarctionR01HL130828 · NHLBI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI BROWN, JEREMIAH R, MATHENY, MICHAEL E. · 2016 to 2019
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL119664NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent preoperative models use clinical risk factors alone in estimating risk of in-hospital mortality following cardiac surgery. However, novel biomarkers now exist to potentially improve preoperative prediction models. An assessment of Galectin-3, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP), and soluble ST2 to improve the predictive ability of an existing prediction model of in-hospital mortality may improve our capacity to risk-stratify patients before surgery. METHODS AND

resultsWe measured preoperative biomarkers in the NNECDSG (Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group), a prospective cohort of 1554 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Exposures of interest were preoperative levels of galectin-3, NT-ProBNP, and ST2. In-hospital mortality and adverse events occurring after coronary artery bypass graft were the outcomes. After adjustment, NT-ProBNP and ST2 showed a statistically significant association with both their median and third tercile categories with NT-ProBNP odds ratios of 2.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-8.05) and 5.43 (95% CI: 1.21-24.44) and ST2 odds ratios of 3.96 (95% CI: 1.60-9.82) and 3.21 (95% CI: 1.17-8.80), respectively. The model receiver operating characteristic score of the base prediction model (0.80 [95% CI: 0.72-0.89]) varied significantly from the new multi-marker model (0.85 [95% CI: 0.79-0.91]). Compared with the Northern New England (NNE) model alone, the full prediction model with biomarkers NT-proBNP and ST2 shows significant improvement in model classification of in-hospital mortality.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates a significant improvement of preoperative prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and suggests that biomarkers can be used to identify patients at higher risk.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassHospital MortalityAgedAged, 80 and overBlood ProteinsCohort StudiesFemaleGalectin 3GalectinsHumansInterleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 ProteinMaleMiddle AgedNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsPostoperative ComplicationsBlood ProteinsGalectin 3GalectinsIL1RL1 protein, humanInterleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 ProteinLGALS3 protein, humanNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)cardiac biomarkerscardiac surgerymortalityoutcomes research

Identifiers

PMID29982227
PMCPMC6064859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.