Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29982198›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2018

Alterations in maternally perceived fetal movement and their association with late stillbirth: findings from the Midland and North of England stillbirth case-control study.

Alexander E P Heazell, Jayne Budd, Minglan Li, Robin Cronin, Billie Bradford, Lesley M E McCowan, Edwin A Mitchell, Tomasina Stacey, Bill Martin, Devender Roberts and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02025530 (The Midlands and North of England Stillbirth Study - A Case-Control Study of Modifiable Factors in Late Stillbirth), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02025530 completednot on this map

The Midlands and North of England Stillbirth Study - A Case-Control Study of Modifiable Factors in Late Stillbirth

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ManchesterRan2014 to 2017Enrolled1,030ConditionsStillbirthArmsQuestionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fetal Movement Counting Using Optical Fibre Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander E P HeazellMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biological, Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4303-7845
Jayne BuddManchester Academic Health Science Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Minglan LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3095-7490
Robin CroninDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Billie BradfordDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Lesley M E McCowan
Edwin A MitchellDepartment of Paediatrics, Child Health and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Tomasina StaceySchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Bill MartinDepartment of Obstetrics, Birmingham Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Devender RobertsDepartment of Obstetrics, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
John M D ThompsonDepartment of Paediatrics, Child Health and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBBirmingham Women's Hospital · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Department of Health CS-2013-13-009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report perception of fetal movements in women who experienced a stillbirth compared with controls at a similar gestation with a live birth.

designCase-control study.

setting41 maternity units in the UK.

participantsCases were women who had a late stillbirth ≥28 weeks gestation (n=291) and controls were women with an ongoing pregnancy at the time of the interview (n=733). Controls were frequency matched to cases by obstetric unit and gestational age.

methodsData were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire which included questions on maternal perception of fetal movement (frequency, strength, increased and decreased movements and hiccups) in the 2 weeks before the interview/stillbirth. Five fetal movement patterns were identified incorporating the changes in strength and frequency in the last 2 weeks by combining groups of similar pattern and risk. Multivariable analysis adjusted for known confounders. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Association of maternally perceived fetal movements in relation to late stillbirth.

resultsIn multivariable analyses, women who reported increased strength of movements in the last 2 weeks had decreased risk of late stillbirth compared with those whose movements were unchanged (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.18, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.26). Women with decreased frequency (without increase in strength) of fetal movements were at increased risk (aOR 4.51, 95% CI 2.38 to 8.55). Daily perception of fetal hiccups was protective (aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.56).

conclusionsIncreased strength of fetal movements and fetal hiccups is associated with decreased risk of stillbirth. Alterations in frequency of fetal movements are important in identifying pregnancies at increased risk of stillbirth, with the greatest risk in women noting a reduction in fetal activity. Clinical guidance should be updated to reflect that increase in strength and frequency of fetal movements is associated with the lowest risk of stillbirth, and that decreased fetal movements are associated with stillbirth. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02025530.

Indexed as

Fetal MovementPregnancy Trimester, ThirdStillbirthCase-Control StudiesFemaleFetal MonitoringHiccupHumansLogistic ModelsMultivariate AnalysisPerceptionPregnancyRisk FactorsUnited Kingdomexaggerated fetal movementfetal movementmaternal perceptionreduced fetal movementrisk factorstillbirth

Identifiers

PMID29982198
PMCPMC6042603
OpenAlexW2803186166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.