Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29981086›Full record

Trial reportCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2018

Guelph Family Health Study: pilot study of a home-based obesity prevention intervention.

Jess Haines, Sabrina Douglas, Julia A Mirotta, Carley O'Kane, Rebecca Breau, Kathryn Walton, Owen Krystia, Elie Chamoun, Angela Annis, Gerarda A Darlington and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02223234 (Guelph Family Health Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02223234 nacompletednot on this map

Guelph Family Health Study: Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of GuelphRan2014 to 2016Enrolled44ConditionsObesityArmsEmails and 4 Home Visits, Control, Emails and 2 home visits
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 2 to 4 years old.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jess HainesDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada. jhaines@uoguelph.ca.
Sabrina DouglasDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Julia A MirottaDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Carley O'KaneDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Rebecca BreauDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Kathryn WaltonDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Owen KrystiaDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Elie ChamounDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Angela AnnisDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Gerarda A DarlingtonDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Andrea C BuchholzDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Alison M DuncanDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Lori A VallisDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Lawrence L SprietDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
David M MutchDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Paula BrauerDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Emma Allen-VercoeDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Elsie M TaverasDepartment of Pediatrics and Population Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
David W L MaDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Guelph Family Health Study
University of Guelph · CAHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the feasibility and preliminary impact of a home-based obesity prevention intervention among Canadian families.

methodsFamilies with children 1.5-5 years of age were randomized to one of three groups: (1) four home visits (HV) with a health educator, emails, and mailed incentives (4HV; n = 17); (2) two HV, emails, and mailed incentives (2HV; n = 14); or (3) general health advice through emails (control; n = 13). Parents randomized to the 2HV and 4HV groups completed post-intervention satisfaction surveys. At baseline and post-intervention, parents reported frequency of family meals and their children's fruit, vegetable, and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake. We assessed the children's physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep using accelerometers and their % fat mass using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Differences in outcomes at post-intervention, controlling for baseline, were examined using generalized estimating equations.

resultsOf the 44 families enrolled, 42 (96%) had 6-month outcome data. Satisfaction with the intervention was high; 80% were "very satisfied" and 20% were "satisfied." At post-intervention, children randomized to the 4HV and 2HV groups had significantly higher fruit intake and children randomized to the 2HV group had significantly lower percentage of fat mass, as compared to the control. No significant intervention effect was found for frequency of family meals, the children's vegetable or SSB intake, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, or sleep.

conclusionsOur results suggest that the delivery of a home-based intervention is feasible among Canadian families and may lead to improved diet and weight outcomes among children. A full-scale trial is needed to test the effectiveness of this home-based intervention. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02223234.

Indexed as

Family HealthHome Care ServicesCanadaChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMalePediatric ObesityPilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationFamilyHealth behaviourObesityRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID29981086
PMCPMC6964565
OpenAlexW2801265315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.