Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29980974›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2018

Late Pancreatic Anastomosis Stricture Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review.

Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, Manuela Cesaretti, Nicolas Tabchouri, Philippe Wind, David Fuks

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Surgical management of biliary malignancy.Current problems in surgery · 2021
    Article
  20. Severe acute pancreatitis 5 years after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alban Zarzavadjian Le BianDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Surgical Oncology - Hôpital Avicenne, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris XIII, 125 rue de Stalingrad, 93000, Bobigny, France. spleen2008@live.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-7384-1148
Manuela CesarettiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185, rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France.
Nicolas TabchouriDepartment of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery - Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France.
Philippe WindDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Surgical Oncology - Hôpital Avicenne, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris XIII, 125 rue de Stalingrad, 93000, Bobigny, France.
David FuksDepartment of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery - Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France.
Université Sorbonne Paris Nord · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRHôpital Paris Saint-Joseph · FRInstitute Mutualiste Montsouris · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith an increasing postoperative survival and prolonged follow-up, late complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) have yet to be thoroughly described and analyzed. Among those, pancreatic anastomosis stricture may lead to severe consequences.

methodsA systematic review focusing on pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis (PJA) stricture.

resultsPJA stricture incidence reached 1.4-11.4% with a median time interval of 34 months after PD. No risk factor was identified. PJA stricture repercussions were inconsistent but postprandial abdominal pain and recurrent acute pancreatitis were the most common symptoms, followed by impaired pancreatic function. To confirm diagnosis, secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (SMRCP) sensitivity reached 56-100%. As impaired pancreatic function is not improved by any procedure, only PJA stricture leading to abdominal pain or acute pancreatitis should be considered for treatment. Endoscopic techniques (mainly ultrasound-assisted "rendezvous") should be proposed prior to surgical repair, with a morbidity, an overall technical and clinical success reaching 16.5-33% and 28.6-100% and 33-100%, respectively. Regarding surgical repair, overall morbidity varied between 14.3 and 33%, with a clinical success reaching 26.1-100%. Finally, total pancreatectomy with islet auto-transplantation should be considered only for pain intractable to medical management and recurrent acute pancreatitis which has failed medical, endoscopic, and traditional surgical management strategies.

conclusionPJA stricture following PD is a late, unusual, and potentially serious complication. When there is currently no clear consensus, PJA stricture leading to abdominal pain or acute pancreatitis should be considered treatment. With increasing survival after PD, further studies should focus on late complications. CORE TIP: Stricture of pancraticojejunostomy is a late and potentially serious complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Incidence reaches 1.4-11.4% and no risk factor is identified. Symptoms are inconsistent but postprandial abdominal pain, recurrent acute pancreatitis, and impaired pancreatic function are the most frequent. To confirm diagnosis, secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is the best modality. Only PJA stricture leading to abdominal pain or acute pancreatitis should be considered for treatment. Endoscopic techniques (mainly ultrasound-assisted "rendezvous") should be proposed prior to surgical repair. Finally, total pancreatectomy with islet auto-transplantation should be considered only for pain intractable to medical management and recurrent acute pancreatitis which has failed medical, endoscopic, and traditional surgical management strategies.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceConstriction, PathologicEndoscopy, GastrointestinalHumansIslets of Langerhans TransplantationPancreatectomyPancreatic DuctsPancreaticoduodenectomyPancreaticojejunostomyPancreatitis, ChronicTime FactorsLate complicationPancreatic anastomosis stricturePancreaticoduodenectomyPancreaticojejunostomy stricturePancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID29980974
OpenAlexW2851367764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.