Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29980898›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2018

Antifungal drug susceptibility profile of clinically important dermatophytes and determination of point mutations in terbinafine-resistant isolates.

Zahra Salehi, Masoomeh Shams-Ghahfarokhi, Mehdi Razzaghi-Abyaneh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Correlation ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Majocchi's granuloma of the scalp caused byFrontiers in pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. A Case of Superficial Mycoses in a Patient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Onychomycosis: Old and New.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Antifungal activity of probiotic strainFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The in vitro Activity of Echinocandins Against ClinicalInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zahra SalehiDepartment of Mycology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 14115-331, Iran.
Masoomeh Shams-GhahfarokhiDepartment of Mycology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 14115-331, Iran. shamsm@modares.ac.ir.
Mehdi Razzaghi-AbyanehDepartment of Mycology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, 13164, Iran.
Tarbiat Modares University · IRPasteur Institute of Iran · IR

Funding

Tarbiat Modares University and Iran National Science Foundation: INSF for funding our research (grant number 94003277).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With regard to increasing number of antifungal-resistant dermatophytes, antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes serves as a useful tool in managing clinical dermatophytosis. This study aimed to determine antifungal susceptibility profile of clinically important dermatophytes and determination of point mutations in terbinafine-resistant isolates. Based on our results, dermatophytosis was confirmed in 97 cases by direct microscopic examination, culture, and sequencing of ITS region. Antifungal susceptibility of 97 dermatophyte isolates distributed in four species including Trichophyton interdigitale (26 isolates), T. rubrum (19 isolates), T. tonsurans (29 isolates), and Epidermophyton floccosum (21 isolates) was assessed to nine antifungal agents using CLSI M38-A2 guidelines. Minimum inhibitory concentration range (MIC range) for luliconazole and terbinafine was 0.001-0.008 μg/ml and 0.003-> 32 μg/ml, compared to 0.03-64 μg/ml for griseofulvin, 0.01-16 μg/ml for itraconazole and voriconazole, 0.03-8 μg/ml for ketoconazole, 0.03-32 μg/ml for econazole, 0.03-1 μg/ml for lanoconazole, and 0.01-4 μg/ml for butenafine. Trichophyton tonsurans was the most susceptible (MIC = 0.006 μg/ml) and E. floccosum was the most resistant (MIC = 0.02 μg/ml) species to terbinafine. Terbinafine resistance was reported for two species, i.e., T. rubrum and T. tonsurans at the total rate of 2% which was due to Leu393Phe substitution in both species. Taken together, our results assist clinicians and prompt the current knowledge about the necessity of antifungal susceptibility testing to select effective strategies for management of clinical cases of dermatophytosis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntifungal AgentsArthrodermataceaeChildChild, PreschoolDrug Resistance, FungalFemaleHumansIranMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPoint MutationTerbinafineAntifungal AgentsTerbinafineAntifungal susceptibility testingDermatophytesDermatophytosisPoint mutationTerbinafine resistance

Identifiers

PMID29980898
OpenAlexW2862769407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.