Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29980882›Full record

ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2019

The effects of ethoxyquin and Angelica sinensis extracts on lipid oxidation in fish feeds and growth, digestive and absorptive capacities and antioxidant status in juvenile red carp (Cyprinus carpio var. xingguonensis): a comparative study.

HuaTao Li, SiYi Tang, WenHao Du, Jun Jiang, PeiYuan Peng, Ping Yuan, YiHong Liao, Jiao Long, SiShun Zhou

Abstract readClinical Trial, Veterinary
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Extract ofVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

HuaTao LiKey Laboratory of Sichuan Province for Conservation and Utilization of Fishes Resources in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, 641000, Sichuan, China. huataoli217@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0252-9541
SiYi TangCollege of Life Science, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, 641000, Sichuan, China.
WenHao DuCollege of Life Science, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, 641000, Sichuan, China.
Jun JiangAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China.
PeiYuan PengCollege of Life Science, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, 641000, Sichuan, China.
Ping YuanCollege of Life Science, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, 641000, Sichuan, China.
YiHong LiaoCollege of Life Science, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, 641000, Sichuan, China.
Jiao LongCollege of Life Science, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, 641000, Sichuan, China.
SiShun ZhouCollege of Life Science, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, 641000, Sichuan, China.
Neijiang Normal University · CNSichuan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

the Doctoral Research Fund of Neijiang Normal University, China 14B07the Science and Technology Commission Foundation of Sichuan Province, China 2015JY0067the Scientific Research Fund of Sichuan Provincial Education Department, China 16ZB0302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Firstly, a linoleic and linolenic acid emulsion and fish feeds were incubated with graded levels of ethoxyquin (EQ) and petroleum ether extract, ethyl acetate extract (EAE), ethanol extract and aqueous extract of Angelica sinensis. The results showed that EQ and extracts of Angelica sinensis (EAs) inhibited lipid oxidation in material above. Of all of the examined EAs, EAE showed the strongest protective effects against the lipid oxidation. Moreover, EAE at high concentrations showed a stronger inhibitory effect on lipid oxidation than that of EQ. Next, 7 experimental diets that respectively supplemented 0.0, 0.2, 0.8 and 3.2 g kg

Indexed as

Angelica sinensisAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAntioxidantsCarpsDietDigestionEthoxyquinGene Expression RegulationLipid PeroxidationPlant ExtractsRandom AllocationAntioxidantsEthoxyquinPlant ExtractsAbsorptionAngelica sinensisAntioxidantDigestionEthoxyquinLipid oxidation

Identifiers

PMID29980882
OpenAlexW2871036764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.