Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29980865›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2018

Future Direction for Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict and Manage Hypertension.

Chayakrit Krittanawong, Andrew S Bomback, Usman Baber, Sripal Bangalore, Franz H Messerli, W H Wilson Tang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for blood pressure control using digital technologies.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Digital hypertension towards to the anticipation medicine.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Artificial Intelligence in Hypertension Management: An Ace up Your Sleeve.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Chayakrit KrittanawongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tenth Avenue, Suite 3A-09, New York, NY, 10019, USA. Chayakrit.Krittanawong@Mountsinai.org.
Andrew S BombackDivision of Nephrology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Usman BaberCardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Sripal BangaloreDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, NYU Langone Health, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Franz H MesserliMount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
W H Wilson TangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cardiovascular Institute of the South · USCleveland Clinic · USColumbia University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USJagiellonian University · PLNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewEvidence that artificial intelligence (AI) is useful for predicting risk factors for hypertension and its management is emerging. However, we are far from harnessing the innovative AI tools to predict these risk factors for hypertension and applying them to personalized management. This review summarizes recent advances in the computer science and medical field, illustrating the innovative AI approach for potential prediction of early stages of hypertension. Additionally, we review ongoing research and future implications of AI in hypertension management and clinical trials, with an eye towards personalized medicine. RECENT

findingsAlthough recent studies demonstrate that AI in hypertension research is feasible and possibly useful, AI-informed care has yet to transform blood pressure (BP) control. This is due, in part, to lack of data on AI's consistency, accuracy, and reliability in the BP sphere. However, many factors contribute to poorly controlled BP, including biological, environmental, and lifestyle issues. AI allows insight into extrapolating data analytics to inform prescribers and patients about specific factors that may impact their BP control. To date, AI has been mainly used to investigate risk factors for hypertension, but has not yet been utilized for hypertension management due to the limitations of study design and of physician's engagement in computer science literature. The future of AI with more robust architecture using multi-omics approaches and wearable technology will likely be an important tool allowing to incorporate biological, lifestyle, and environmental factors into decision-making of appropriate drug use for BP control.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDisease ManagementBiomedical ResearchHumansHypertensionPractice Guidelines as TopicPrecision MedicineArtificial intelligenceBig dataDeep learningHypertensionMachine learningWearable technology

Identifiers

PMID29980865
OpenAlexW2835818200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.