ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2019
[Glaucoma in inpatient care in Germany in 2015].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimAnalysis of structural characteristics of inpatient treatment of glaucoma in clinical units run by affiliated physicians and those run by hospital physicians in Germany are described. The frequency and distribution of glaucoma diagnoses as the main and secondary diagnosis at different departments and glaucoma diagnoses, number of cases, surgeries and procedures and patient characteristics of the four glaucoma-specific diagnosis-related groups (DRG) are presented.
methodSecondary data analysis using the G‑DRG browser from 2015/2016 provided by the German Institute for Remuneration Systems in Hospitals.
resultsIn 30% of the 156,524 cases glaucoma was classified as the main diagnosis, in 24% as secondary diagnosis in ophthalmological departments and 46% as secondary diagnosis in other departments. Primary open angle glaucoma was reported most frequently (40%), whilst non-ophthalmological departments mainly coded as "other" or "unspecified types of glaucoma". Glaucoma was coded in 20 DRGs as the main diagnosis and in all ophthalmic DRGs as secondary diagnosis. The number of cases and procedures differed among the four glaucoma-specific DRGs (C06Z, C07A, C07B, C64Z), the diagnostic spectrum, however, was similar. Patients were mainly women, older and with few comorbidities or complications. The C64Z was mainly characterized by cases with "suspected glaucoma" and only conservative procedures. Only 6% of the glaucoma patients were treated in clinical units run by affiliated physicians. In contrast to units run by hospital physicians surgical DRGs and operations prevailed but the diagnostic spectrum and patient characteristics were not different. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionWith 20% of the main diagnoses, glaucoma was highly relevant for inpatient ophthalmological care. Glaucoma as a secondary diagnosis was also common in other medical specialties, though no diagnostic differentiation was made here. Patients with glaucoma are mainly treated in clinical units run by hospital physicians. Nevertheless, patients of affiliated physicians showed the same characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.