Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29980815›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2019

[Pharmacotherapy and kidney dysfunction].

F Keller

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Pharmacological/pharmaceutical counseling in intensive care medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

F KellerSektion Nephrologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland. frieder.keller@uniklinik-ulm.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Essential for drug dose adjustment is the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) not the serum creatinine level. In acute disease, a loading dose must be given that usually corresponds to the normal dose. The eliminated half-life is used to estimate the administration interval. For anti-infective drugs with a concentration-dependent effect, the target is the high peak such as for daptomycin, linezolide, and colistin. For anti-infective drugs with a time-dependent effect, the target is the high trough such as for piperacillin, meropenem and vancomycin. Such drugs with a time-dependent action should best be administered by infusion not by bolus dosing. With continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), the total filtration rate corresponds to a GFR of 30-50 ml/min and many antibiotics will not need a dose reduction on CRRT. After intermittent hemodialysis, a new loading dose should be given to ascertain sufficiently high concentrations in the interval until the next dose or next dialysis.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessGlomerular Filtration RatePharmacokineticsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansKidney DiseasesMeropenemPiperacillinVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsMeropenemPiperacillinVancomycinContinuous infusionLoading dosePharmacodynamicsPharmacokineticsTarget concentration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.