Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29980671›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Intermedin protects against sepsis by concurrently re-establishing the endothelial barrier and alleviating inflammatory responses.

Fei Xiao, Denian Wang, Lingmiao Kong, Min Li, Zhongxue Feng, Bingxing Shuai, Lijun Wang, Yong'gang Wei, Hongyu Li, Sisi Wu and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Peripheral Immune Cell Infiltration in the Hippocampus of Sepsis Mice.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. IntermedinJournal of inflammation research · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fei XiaoMolecular Medicine Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Denian WangMolecular Medicine Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Lingmiao KongMolecular Medicine Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Min LiMolecular Medicine Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Zhongxue FengMolecular Medicine Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Bingxing ShuaiDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Lijun WangMolecular Medicine Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yong'gang WeiDepartment of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Hongyu LiDepartment of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Sisi WuMolecular Medicine Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Chun TanMolecular Medicine Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Huan ZhaoMolecular Medicine Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Xuejiao HuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jin LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yan KangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Xuelian LiaoDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yan ZhouDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Wei ZhangMolecular Medicine Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. zhangwei197610@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7588-7249
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 81301623National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 81302144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition caused by dysregulated host responses to infection. Widespread vascular hyperpermeability and a "cytokine storm" are two pathophysiological hallmarks of sepsis. Here, we show that intermedin (IMD), a member of the calcitonin family, alleviates organ injury and decreases mortality in septic mice by concurrently alleviating vascular leakage and inflammatory responses. IMD promotes the relocation of vascular endothelial cadherin through a Rab11-dependent pathway to dynamically repair the disrupted endothelial junction. Additionally, IMD decreases inflammatory responses by reducing macrophage infiltration via downregulating CCR2 expression. IMD peptide administration ameliorates organ injuries and significantly improves the survival of septic mice, and the experimental results correlate with the clinical data. Patients with high IMD levels exhibit a lower risk of shock, lower severity scores, and greatly improved survival outcomes than those with low IMD levels. Based on our data, IMD may be an important self-protective factor in response to sepsis.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdherens JunctionsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsFemaleHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsInflammationMacrophagesMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMiddle AgedNeuropeptidesADM2 protein, humanintermedin protein, mouseNeuropeptidesPeptide Hormonesrab11 GTP-Binding Proteinsrab GTP-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29980671
PMCPMC6035189
OpenAlexW2811088088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.