Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29980662›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

A mosaic monoploid reference sequence for the highly complex genome of sugarcane.

Olivier Garsmeur, Gaetan Droc, Rudie Antonise, Jane Grimwood, Bernard Potier, Karen Aitken, Jerry Jenkins, Guillaume Martin, Carine Charron, Catherine Hervouet and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 203 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
203citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

203 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Adaptive Responses of Tropical Crops: A Multi-Scale Omics Integrated Perspective.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A sorghum-anchored pan-grass syntenic gene set in grasses.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Genome-wide analysis of the sugarcane SUT gene family reveals ShSUT4 as a key regulator of abiotic stress responses.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Transgenic sugarcane harboringFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  18. Discovery of a defence-response gene forFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

143 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Olivier GarsmeurCIRAD (Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement), UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8869-3689
Gaetan DrocCIRAD (Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement), UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1849-1269
Rudie AntoniseKEYGENE N.V., 6708 PW, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jane GrimwoodHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, 35801, USA.
Bernard PotierSASRI (South African Sugarcane Research Institute), Mount Edgecombe, 4300, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1907-235X
Karen AitkenCSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation), St. Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia.
Jerry JenkinsHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, 35801, USA.
Guillaume MartinCIRAD (Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement), UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1801-7500
Carine CharronCIRAD (Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement), UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0281-9936
Catherine HervouetCIRAD (Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement), UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Laurent CostetCIRAD, UMR PVBMT, F-97410, Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3199-2885
Nabila YahiaouiCIRAD (Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement), UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Adam HealeyHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, 35801, USA.
David SimsHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, 35801, USA.
Yesesri CherukuriHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, 35801, USA.
Avinash SreedasyamHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, 35801, USA.
Andrzej KilianDiversity Arrays Technology, Yarralumla, ACT, 2600, Australia.
Agnes ChanJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Marie-Anne Van SluysUniversidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, 05508-090, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6506-2734
Kankshita SwaminathanHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, 35801, USA.
Christopher TownJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4653-4262
Hélène BergèsINRA-CNRGV, 31326, Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Blake SimmonsJBEI Joint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA, 94608, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1332-1810
Jean Christophe GlaszmannCIRAD (Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement), UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Edwin van der VossenKEYGENE N.V., 6708 PW, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Robert HenryQAAFI (Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation), University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4060-0292
Jeremy SchmutzHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, 35801, USA.
Angélique D'HontCIRAD (Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement), UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France. dhont@cirad.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is a major crop for sugar and bioenergy production. Its highly polyploid, aneuploid, heterozygous, and interspecific genome poses major challenges for producing a reference sequence. We exploited colinearity with sorghum to produce a BAC-based monoploid genome sequence of sugarcane. A minimum tiling path of 4660 sugarcane BAC that best covers the gene-rich part of the sorghum genome was selected based on whole-genome profiling, sequenced, and assembled in a 382-Mb single tiling path of a high-quality sequence. A total of 25,316 protein-coding gene models are predicted, 17% of which display no colinearity with their sorghum orthologs. We show that the two species, S. officinarum and S. spontaneum, involved in modern cultivars differ by their transposable elements and by a few large chromosomal rearrangements, explaining their distinct genome size and distinct basic chromosome numbers while also suggesting that polyploidization arose in both lineages after their divergence.

Indexed as

MosaicismPloidiesBase SequenceChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialChromosomes, PlantDNA Transposable ElementsGene AmplificationGenome, PlantGenomic Structural VariationModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSaccharumSequence Analysis, DNASorghumDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID29980662
PMCPMC6035169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.