Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29980552›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2018

Yersinia pseudotuberculosis Prevalence and Diversity in Wild Boars in Northeast Germany.

Marie Reinhardt, Jens Andre Hammerl, Katharina Kunz, Andrea Barac, Karsten Nöckler, Stefan Hertwig

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. HighMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  2. Characterisation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Higher Resistance ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Yersiniosis in New Zealand.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marie ReinhardtGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany.
Jens Andre HammerlGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany.
Katharina KunzGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany.
Andrea BaracGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany.
Karsten NöcklerGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan HertwigGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany stefan.hertwig@bfr.bund.de.
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the prevalence of

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriological TechniquesElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldFemaleGermanyMalePrevalenceSus scrofaSwineSwine DiseasesYersinia pseudotuberculosisYersinia pseudotuberculosis Infectionsantimicrobial resistancecultural detectionvirulencewhole-genome sequencingwild boarsYersinia pseudotuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID29980552
PMCPMC6122006
OpenAlexW2810200109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.