Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29980547›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2018

Integrating culturally informed approaches into physiotherapy assessment and treatment of chronic pain: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Bernadette Brady, Irena Veljanova, Siobhan Schabrun, Lucinda Chipchase

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Cultural tailoring of pain management approaches: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A modern way to teach and practice manual therapy.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2024
    Review
  6. Attending to Marginalization in The Chronic Pain Literature: A Scoping Review.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Cultural Competence In Physical Therapy: The Road Less Traveled.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Definitions ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinician's Commentary on Vazir et al.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bernadette BradySchool of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2611-6736
Irena VeljanovaSchool of Social Science and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Siobhan SchabrunSchool of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Lucinda ChipchaseSchool of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Western Sydney University · AULiverpool Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate patient engagement with, and the feasibility of, a novel, culturally adapted physiotherapy pain management approach.

designA participant-blinded and assessor-blinded pilot randomised controlled trial.

settingOutpatient physiotherapy departments at two public hospitals and one district pain clinic.

participantsAdults (n=48) with chronic musculoskeletal pain (daily pain >3 months), who self-identified as Mandaean, Assyrian or Vietnamese, were randomised to one of two physiotherapy treatment conditions.

interventions24 participants underwent combined group and individualised treatment described as 'culturally adapted physiotherapy', while 24 underwent evidence-informed 'usual physiotherapy care'. Both treatment arms consisted of up to 10 sessions over a 3-month period. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient engagement was measured via participant attendance, adherence and satisfaction data. Secondary outcomes included clinical measures of pain severity, interference and suffering, physical function and negative emotional state.

results96% of participants undergoing culturally adapted physiotherapy completed treatment, compared with 58% of the usual physiotherapy group. For the culturally adapted group attendance (87%±18%) and adherence (68%±32%) were higher relative to usual care (68%±32% and 55%±43%). Satisfaction was similar for the culturally adapted (82.7%±13.4%) and usual care (79.3±17.3) groups. For secondary outcomes, a significant between-group effect for pain-related suffering in favour of the culturally adapted group was observed with a medium effect size (partial η

conclusionsAligning treatment with the beliefs and values of culturally and linguistically diverse communities enhances patient engagement with physiotherapy. These results support the feasibility of a larger, multisite trial to determine if improved engagement with culturally adapted physiotherapy translates to improved clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616000857404; Pre-results.

Indexed as

EthnicityPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAdultAustraliaChronic PainClinical ProtocolsCulturally Competent CareDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedEmigration and ImmigrationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal PainPain MeasurementPatient Acceptance of Health Carechronic paincultural competencycultural diversityphysical therapy speciality

Identifiers

PMID29980547
PMCPMC6042550
OpenAlexW2883966167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.