ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2018
Implantable Ventricular Assist Device Use and Outcomes in People With End-Stage Renal Disease.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of Dialysis for Patients Receiving Mechanical Circulatory Support.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026Review
- Study of the energy efficiency of various drive systems of an innovative implantable left ventricular assist device.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Association of Kidney Function With Myocardial Recovery and Adverse Events Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Circulatory Support.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Axillary mechanical circulatory support improves renal function prior to heart transplantation in patients with chronic kidney disease.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Left Ventricular Assist Device as a Destination Therapy: Current Situation and the Importance of Patient Selection.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Renal Ramifications.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Outcomes With Left Ventricular Assist Device in End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2022Review
- Renal Function in Patients with or without a Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant During Listing for a Heart Transplant.Annals of transplantation · 2020Article
- Heart failure management in dialysis patients: Many treatment options with no clear evidence.Seminars in dialysis · 2020 · on this mapReview
- Cardiorenal Syndrome and Heart Failure-Challenges and Opportunities.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2019Review
- Implantable Ventricular Assist Device Use and Outcomes in People With End-Stage Renal Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at risk for advanced heart failure, but little is known about use and outcomes of durable mechanical circulatory support in this setting. We examined use and outcomes of implantable ventricular assist devices (VADs) in a national ESRD cohort. METHODS AND
resultsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD who underwent implantable VAD placement from 2006 to 2014. We examined in-hospital and 1-year mortality, all-cause and cause-specific hospitalizations, and heart/kidney transplantation outcomes. We investigated as predictors demographic factors, time-period of VAD implantation, primary or post-cardiotomy implantation, and duration of ESRD before VAD implantation. We identified 96 people with ESRD who underwent implantable VAD placement. At time of VAD implantation, 74 (77.1%) were receiving hemodialysis, 10 (10.4%) were receiving peritoneal dialysis and 12 (12.5%) had renal transplant. Time from incident ESRD to VAD implantation was median 4.0 (interquartile range 1.1, 8.2) years. Mortality during the implantation hospitalization was 40.6%. Within 1 year of implantation 61.5% of people had died. On multivariable analysis, males had half the mortality risk of females. Lower mortality risk was also seen with VAD implantation in a primary setting, and with more recent year of implantation, but these results did not reach statistical significance.
conclusionsMedicare beneficiaries with ESRD are undergoing durable VAD implantation, often several years after incident ESRD, although in low numbers. Mortality is high among these patients, highlighting the need for investigations to improve treatment selection and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.