Trial reportOphthalmology2018
Panretinal Photocoagulation Versus Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: Factors Associated with Vision and Edema Outcomes.
Trial report in Ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01489189 (Prompt Panretinal Photocoagulation Versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab With Deferred Panretinal Photocoagulation for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prompt Panretinal Photocoagulation Versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab With Deferred Panretinal Photocoagulation for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global research trends, reporting and handling of missing data in observational studies of type 2 diabetes mellitus with mild cognitive impairment from 2020 to 2025: a systematic review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for proliferative diabetic retinopathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy as an Alternative or Adjunct to Pan-Retinal Photocoagulation in Treating Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Brolucizumab in the Treatment of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: The CONDOR Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA ophthalmology · 2026Trial
- Intravitreal conbercept for diabetic macular oedema: 2-year results from a randomised controlled trial and open-label extension study.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2022Trial
- Suprachoroidal injection in the treatment of diabetic macular edema: mechanisms, clinical advances, and future perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Diabetic retinopathy-recommendations for screening and treatment.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2025Review
- Panretinal photocoagulation plus intravitreal conbercept for diabetic retinopathy in real world: a retrospective study.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Metabolomic analysis of aqueous humor reveals potential metabolite biomarkers for differential detection of macular edema.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2023Article
- A prediction model for worsening diabetic retinopathy after panretinal photocoagulation.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2022Article
- Regional Variety of Reduction in Retinal Thickness of Diabetic Macular Edema after Anti-VEGF Treatment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- A Paradigm Shift in the Management Approaches of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: Role of Anti-VEGF Therapy.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- Outcomes of combined treatments in patients with retinal arterial macroaneurysm.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Statement of the German Ophthalmological Society, the German Retina Society, and the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists in Germany on treatment of diabetic macular edema : Dated August 2019.Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Various Treatments for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- [Statement of the German Ophthalmological Society, the Retinological Society and the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists in Germany on treatment of diabetic macular edema : Situation August 2019].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020Review
- Role of Systemic Factors in Improving the Prognosis of Diabetic Retinal Disease and Predicting Response to Diabetic Retinopathy Treatment.Ophthalmology scienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo identify baseline factors associated with change in visual acuity or development of vision-impairing central-involved diabetic macular edema (DME) over 2 years when treating proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) with ranibizumab or panretinal photocoagulation (PRP).
designPost hoc analyses of randomized, multicenter clinical trial data.
participantsEyes completing the 2-year visit (n = 328) or without vision-impairing central-involved DME at baseline (n = 302) in Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol S.
methodsIntravitreous ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 ml) or PRP.
main outcome measuresChange in visual acuity (area under the curve) and development of vision-impairing (20/32 or worse) central-involved DME over 2 years.
resultsAfter multivariable model selection with adjustment for baseline visual acuity and central subfield thickness, no factors were identified as associated with change in visual acuity or development of vision-impairing central-involved DME within the ranibizumab group. In the PRP group, worse change in visual acuity was more likely with higher hemoglobin A
conclusionsFor eyes managed with PRP, higher hemoglobin A
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.