Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29980229›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Aedes aegypti in the Black Sea: recent introduction or ancient remnant?

Panayiota Kotsakiozi, Andrea Gloria-Soria, Francis Schaffner, Vincent Robert, Jeffrey R Powell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 1206 genomes reveal origin and movement ofScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Heliyon · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Two Haplotypes ofInsects · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Panayiota KotsakioziYale University, 21 Sachem Street, New Haven, CT, 06520-8105, USA. pkotsakiozi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8007-5330
Andrea Gloria-SoriaYale University, 21 Sachem Street, New Haven, CT, 06520-8105, USA.
Francis SchaffnerFrancis Schaffner Consultancy, Lörracherstrasse 50, 4125, Riehen, Switzerland.
Vincent RobertMIVEGEC Unit, IRD, CNRS, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Jeffrey R PowellYale University, 21 Sachem Street, New Haven, CT, 06520-8105, USA.

Funding

Genetics of Vector Populations: Aedes aegypiR01AI101112 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, JEFFREY R · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
Bodossaki Foundation Not applicableEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Not applicableEuropean Food Safety Authority OC/EFSA/AHAW/ 2013/02-FWC1National Institutes of Health RO1 AI101112NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI101112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti transmits viral diseases that have plagued humans for centuries. Its ancestral home are forests of Africa and ~400-600 years ago it invaded the New World and later Europe and Asia, causing some of the largest epidemics in human history. The species was rarely detected in countries surrounding the Mediterranean Sea after the 1950s, but during the last 16 years it re-appeared in Madeira, Russia and in the eastern coast of the Black Sea. We genotyped Ae. aegypti populations from the Black Sea region to investigate whether this is a recent invasion (and if so, where it came from) or a remnant of pre-eradication populations that extended across the Mediterranean. We also use the Black Sea populations together with a world reference panel of populations to shed more light into the phylogeographical history of this species.

resultsMicrosatellites and ~19,000 genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) support the monophyletic origin of all populations outside Africa, with the New World as the site of first colonization. Considering the phylogenetic relationships, the Black Sea populations are basal to all Asian populations sampled. Bayesian analyses combined with multivariate analyses on both types of markers suggest that the Black Sea population is a remnant of an older population. Approximate Bayesian Computation Analysis indicates with equal probability, that the origin of Black Sea populations was Asia or New World and assignment tests favor the New World.

conclusionsOur results confirmed that Ae. aegypti left Africa and arrived in New World ~500 years ago. The lineage that returned to the Old World and gave rise to present day Asia and the Black Sea populations split from the New World approximately 100-150 years ago. Globally, the Black Sea population is genetically closer to Asia, but still highly differentiated from both New World and Asian populations. This evidence, combined with bottleneck signatures and divergence time estimates, support the hypothesis of present day Black Sea populations being remnants of older populations, likely the now extinct Mediterranean populations that, consistent with the historic epidemiological record, likely represent the original return of Ae. aegypti to the Old World.

Indexed as

Disease VectorsGenetic VariationGenotypeAedesAnimalsBayes TheoremBlack SeaFemaleGenetics, PopulationHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsMosquito VectorsPhylogenyPhylogeographyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideYellow FeverArbovirus vectorEvolutionary historyMicrosatellitesPhylogenyPopulation geneticsSNPsYellow fever mosquito

Identifiers

PMID29980229
PMCPMC6035450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.