Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29980159›Full record

Observational studyRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2018

Score Establishment and Brazilian Portuguese version of the Pregnancy Sexual Response Inventory (PSRI).

Cibele Vieira Cunha Rudge, Iracema de Mattos Paranhos Calderon, Ana Paula Machado de Almeida, Fernanda Piculo, Marilza Vieira Cunha Rudge, Angélica Mércia Pascon Barbosa

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cibele Vieira Cunha RudgeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Iracema de Mattos Paranhos CalderonDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Ana Paula Machado de AlmeidaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Fernanda PiculoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Marilza Vieira Cunha RudgeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Angélica Mércia Pascon BarbosaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo establish the Pregnancy Sexual Response Inventory (PSRI) scores for each domain before and during pregnancy, and to publish the Brazilian Portuguese version of the PSRI.

methodsPregnant women were recruited during antenatal care; the PSRI was administered to 244 women prenatally at Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, at Universidade do Estado de São Paulo (UNESP, in the Portuguese acronym). The PSRI scores were estimated based on the Kings Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short form survey (SF-36). The raw scale type was used to standardize the minimal value and amplitude of each domain. For each domain, the score varied from 0 to 100, and the composite score was obtained as the domain average. The composite score before and during pregnancy was determined by the sum of the scores of all specific domains for each divided by the full domain number. The categorization of the scale into quartiles was established when all PSRI-specific and composite scores were combined.

resultsThe composite and specific scores for each domain were categorized into quartiles: 0 < 25 as "very bad;" 25 < 50 as "bad;" 50 < 75 as "good" and 75 to 100 as "excellent." The mean scores were lower during pregnancy than before pregnancy in 8 of the 10 domains. The Brazilian Portuguese PSRI version is presented.

conclusionThis study allowed the establishment of the PSRI composite and specific scores for each domain, and the categorization of scores into quartiles: very bad, bad, good and excellent. In addition, the Brazilian Portuguese version of the PSRI is presented in full for application in the Brazilian population.

Indexed as

Self ReportSexual BehaviorAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyTranslationsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29980159
PMCPMC10316892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.