Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29979958›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental child psychology2018

Symbolic flexibility during unsupervised word learning in children and adults.

Tanja C Roembke, Kelsey K Wiggs, Bob McMurray

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental child psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tanja C RoembkeDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: tanja-roembke@uiowa.edu.
Kelsey K WiggsDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Bob McMurrayDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA; Department of Linguistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
University of Iowa · USIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Speech Production &LanguageP50DC000242 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Bruce Jay Gantz · 1989 to 2026
$58.8M
The Development of Real Time Spoken and Written Word Recognition: Cognitive Bases of Language and Educational OutcomesR01DC008089 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MCMURRAY, BOB · 2007 to 2023
$7.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000242NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considerable debate in language acquisition concerns whether word learning is driven by domain-general (symbolically flexible) or domain-specific learning mechanisms. Prior work has shown that very young children can map objects to either words or nonlinguistic sounds, but by 20 months of age this ability narrows to only words. This suggests that although symbolically flexible mechanisms are operative early, they become more specified over development. However, such research has been conducted only with young children in ostensive teaching contexts. Thus, we investigated symbolic flexibility at later ages in more referentially ambiguous learning situations. In Experiment 1, 47 6- to 8-year-olds acquired eight symbol-object mappings in a cross-situational word learning paradigm where multiple mappings are learned based only on co-occurrence. In the word condition participants learned with novel pseudowords, whereas in the sound condition participants learned with nonlinguistic sounds (e.g., beeps). Children acquired the mappings, but performance did not differ across conditions, suggesting broad symbolic flexibility. In Experiment 2, 41 adults learned 16 mappings in a comparable design. They learned with ease in both conditions but showed a significant advantage for words. Thus, symbolic flexibility decreases with age, potentially due to repeated experiences with linguistic materials. Moreover, trial-by-trial analyses of the microstructure of both children's and adults' performance did not reveal any substantial differences due to condition, consistent with the hypothesis that learning mechanisms are generally employed similarly with both words and nonlinguistic sounds.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentVerbal LearningAcoustic StimulationAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleSoundYoung AdultCross-situational learningLanguage developmentStatistical learningSymbolic flexibilityVocabulary acquisitionWord learning

Identifiers

PMID29979958
PMCPMC6086380
OpenAlexW2810581702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.