Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29979712›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Efficacy and safety data in elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma included in the nivolumab Expanded Access Program (EAP) in Italy.

Maria Giuseppa Vitale, Sarah Scagliarini, Luca Galli, Sandro Pignata, Giovanni Lo Re, Alfredo Berruti, Carlotta Defferrari, Massimiliano Spada, Cristina Masini, Daniele Santini and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07117409 (Retrospective Observational Study on the Safety of Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Renal Carcinoma and Renal Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07117409 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Retrospective Observational Study on the Safety of Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Renal Carcinoma and Renal Failure

TypeobservationalSponsorAzienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCSRan2020 to 2025Enrolled81ConditionsMetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Maria Giuseppa VitaleAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8551-266X
Sarah ScagliariniAORN A. Cardarelli, Napoli, Italy.
Luca GalliAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Sandro PignataIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Giovanni Lo ReAzienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria Degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy.
Alfredo BerrutiAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Carlotta DefferrariOspedale Galliera, Genova, Italy.
Massimiliano SpadaFondazione istituto Giglio, Cefalu, Italy.
Cristina MasiniArcispedale Santa Maria Nuova di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Daniele SantiniPoliclinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy.
Libero CiuffredaAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.
Enzo Maria RuggeriOspedale di Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy.
Carmelo BengalaUSL 9 Presidio Ospedaliero della Misericordia, Grosseto, Italy.
Lorenzo LiviUniversità di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Daniele FagnaniASST DI Vimercate, Vimercate, Italy.
Andrea BonettiMater Salutis Hospital, Legnago, Italy.
Lucio GiustiniArea Vasta 4, Fermo, Italy.
Alketa HamzajAzienda USL 8 Arezzo, Italy.
Giuseppe ProcopioFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Claudia CasertaAzienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria di Terni, Terni, Italy.
Roberto SabbatiniAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResults from phase III clinical trial CheckMate 025 have established nivolumab as the standard of care for treatment of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) after VEGF inhibitor failure; however, elderly patients are under-represented in the registration trial and little is known about the activity of nivolumab in this subgroup. The purpose of the Expanded Access Program was to provide nivolumab to patients with mRCC who had progressed despite treatment with other agents that were considered standard of care.

methodsNivolumab 3 mg/kg was administered intravenously every 2 weeks to a maximum of 24 months or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The current analysis included all patients from the EAP Italian cohort who had received ≥1 dose of nivolumab. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0.

resultsA total of 389 patients with advanced RCC were enrolled in the Italian cohort of the EAP and treated with nivolumab. Of these patients, 125 (32%) were at least 70 years of age and 70 (18%) were at least 75 years of age. Efficacy with nivolumab in the elderly patients was similar to that observed in the overall EAP population and in the CheckMate 025 trial. Safety was comparable between the elderly patients and the overall EAP population, and was consistent with what previously reported.

conclusionThe final results suggest that elderly patients with pretreated metastatic RCC may benefit from therapy with nivolumab.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleHumansItalyKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingNivolumabRetreatmentSurvival AnalysisAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID29979712
PMCPMC6034807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.