Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29979703›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Effects of cnidarian biofouling on salmon gill health and development of amoebic gill disease.

Nina Bloecher, Mark Powell, Sigurd Hytterød, Mona Gjessing, Jannicke Wiik-Nielsen, Saima N Mohammad, Joachim Johansen, Haakon Hansen, Oliver Floerl, Anne-Gerd Gjevre

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nina BloecherSINTEF Ocean, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8009-331X
Mark PowellNorwegian Institute for Water Research, Bergen, Norway.
Sigurd HytterødNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Mona GjessingNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Jannicke Wiik-NielsenNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Saima N MohammadNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Joachim JohansenNorwegian Institute for Water Research, Bergen, Norway.
Haakon HansenNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Oliver FloerlSINTEF Ocean, Trondheim, Norway.
Anne-Gerd GjevreNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Veterinary Institute · NONorwegian Institute for Water Research · NOSINTEF · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the potential implications of biofouling management on the development of an infectious disease in Norwegian farmed salmon. The hydroid Ectopleura larynx frequently colonises cage nets at high densities (thousands of colonies per m2) and is released into the water during regular in-situ net cleaning. Contact with the hydroids' nematocysts has the potential to cause irritation and pathological damage to salmon gills. Amoebic gill disease (AGD), caused by the amoeba Paramoeba perurans, is an increasingly international health challenge in Atlantic salmon farming. AGD often occurs concomitantly with other agents of gill disease. This study used laboratory challenge trials to: (1) characterise the gill pathology resulting from the exposure of salmon to hydroids, and (2) investigate if such exposure can predispose the fish to secondary infections-using P. perurans as an example. Salmon in tanks were exposed either to freshly 'shredded' hydroids resembling waste material from net cleaning, or to authentic concentrations of free-living P. perurans, or first to 'shredded' hydroids and then to P. perurans. Gill health (AGD gill scores, non-specific gill scores, lamellar thrombi, epithelial hyperplasia) was monitored over 5 weeks and compared to an untreated control group. Nematocysts of E. larynx contained in cleaning waste remained active following high-pressure cleaning, resulting in higher non-specific gill scores in salmon up to 1 day after exposure to hydroids. Higher average numbers of gill lamellar thrombi occurred in fish up to 7 days after exposure to hydroids. However, gill lesions caused by hydroids did not affect the infection rates of P. perurans or the disease progression of AGD. This study discusses the negative impacts hydroids and current net cleaning practices can have on gill health and welfare of farmed salmon, highlights existing knowledge gaps and reiterates the need for alternative approaches to net cleaning.

Indexed as

BiofoulingCnidariaAmebiasisAmoebaAnimalsCnidarian VenomsDisease SusceptibilityFish DiseasesGillsSalmo salarCnidarian Venoms

Identifiers

PMID29979703
PMCPMC6034824
OpenAlexW2869241011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.