Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29979046›Full record

ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2019

Protein-Water-Ice Contact Angle.

Jens O M Karlsson, Ido Braslavsky, Janet A W Elliott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. On the engulfment of antifreeze proteins by ice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  2. Extended Temperature Range of the Ice-Binding Protein Activity.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Ice-binding proteins and the applicability and limitations of the kinetic pinning model.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Combined molecular dynamics and neural network method for predicting protein antifreeze activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jens O M KarlssonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering , Villanova University , Villanova , Pennsylvania 19085 , United States.
Ido BraslavskyInstitute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment , The Hebrew University of Jerusalem , Rehovot 7610001 , Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8985-8211
Janet A W ElliottDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering & Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology , University of Alberta , Edmonton AB , Canada T6G 1H9.ORCID 0000-0002-7883-3243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protein-water-ice contact angle is a controlling parameter in diverse fields. Here we show that data from three different experiments, at three different length scales, with three different proteins, in three different laboratories yield a consistent value for the protein-water-ice contact angle (88.0 ± 1.3°) when analyzed using the Gibbs-Thomson equation. The measurements reinforce the validity of each other, and the fact that similar values are obtained across diverse length scales, experiments, and proteins yields insight into protein-water interactions and the applicability of thermodynamics at the nanoscale.

Indexed as

IceAntifreeze ProteinsModels, MolecularThermodynamicsTight JunctionsAntifreeze ProteinsIce

Identifiers

PMID29979046
PMCPMC6563840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.