Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29978557›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2018

Skin closure in arthroplasty surgery: Current practice.

Jonathan Barrow, Hiren Divecha, Tim Board

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04492852 (Comparison of Surgical Site Infection After Skin Closure by Prolene or Staples in Bilateral Knee Arthroplasty Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04492852 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Surgical Site Infection After Skin Closure by Prolene or Staples in Bilateral Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Parallel Design Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndus Hospital and Health NetworkRan2020 to 2021Enrolled82ConditionsTotal Knee ReplacementArmsPolypropylene (PROLENE) sutures, Staple Sutures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan BarrowTrauma and Orthopaedic Registrar, North West Deanery, Manchester, UK.
Hiren DivechaTrauma and Orthopaedic Registrar, North West Deanery, Manchester, UK.
Tim BoardConsultant Orthopaedic Hip Surgeon at Wrightington Hospital, Professor at Manchester University, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, UK.
Health Education North West · GBWest Midlands Deanery · GBWrightington Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study by Smith et al. (2010) concluded that clips are associated with 3 times the infection rate compared with subcuticular sutures in orthopaedic surgery (P = .01).For hip surgery, there was a 4-fold increase. We aimed to determine the trends and influences in skin closure and wound care for hip and knee arthroplasty in the northwest region as well as what would change surgeons' current practice. A short online survey was emailed to consultants in the northwest of England enquiring about their current practice in superficial skin closure, what has influenced this, and finally what would change their practice. Returned surveys were then analysed. A total of 45 consultants responded (response rate of 40.2%). In both hip and knee arthroplasty, clips were the most commonly used superficial skin closure material (53% and 63%, respectively). Personal experience was the greatest influence on the choice of closure material in both hip and knees (84% and 93% respectively). A total of 66% of hip and 76% of knee surgeons would change their closure material if there was evidence to support this. Hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons are influenced by their personal experience, and most use clips as their skin closure method. Most would change their practice with evidence of one material over another. We conclude that there is need for a prospective, well-powered, multi-centre randomised control trial to determine the skin closure material that has the lowest return-to-theatre rate in arthroplasty surgery.

Indexed as

Surgical InstrumentsSuturesWound Closure TechniquesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWound Healingarthroplastyclipshipkneesutures

Identifiers

PMID29978557
PMCPMC7949891
OpenAlexW2844881097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.