ArticleEndocrine pathology2018
Reclassification as NIFTP: a Retrospective Review in a Single Institution with an Emphasis on Workload.
Article in Endocrine pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- "Your cancer is no longer considered cancer": Psychological reactions to reclassification information and communication preferences.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- HBME1 and CK19 expression in non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) vs other follicular patterned thyroid lesions.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Practice Paradigms Before and After Introduction of the Diagnosis-Noninvasive Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm with Papillary-Like Nuclear Features (NIFTP): an Institutional Experience.Endocrine pathology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the number of cases of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) which could be reclassified as non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) in our institute over a 10-year period, document their clinical status and assess the number of slides that had to be reviewed per case to exclude NIFTP. The histopathology reports for thyroid resections for all papillary carcinoma over a 10-year period (2007-2016) were reviewed. Five hundred forty-five histopathology reports were reviewed, and 71 cases were identified as potential cases of NIFTP. Forty-nine (69%) cases had been referred from external departments and the slides were not available for review. Of the remaining 22 (31% of 71) cases, 5 were reclassified as NIFTP. The 17 cases that were not reclassified as NIFTP required review of 114 of 356 slides (median 5.5 slides per case) was required to exclude NIFTP. For the 5 NIFTP cases, 58 slides were reviewed (median 12 slides per case). We found that review of the histology reports alone was adequate for exclusion in most cases, e.g. classic PTC or EVPTC cases with documented lymphovascular invasion or capsular invasion. As a single exclusion criterion is required for exclusion from reclassification as NIFTP, this can be achieved efficiently. Two of the five patients received radioactive iodine [RAI] as per standard treatment at time of diagnosis, on the basis of tumour size. None have recurrent or metastatic disease with mean follow-up of 5.8 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.