Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29978353›Full record

ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2018

Complex PCI procedures: challenges for the interventional cardiologist.

Nikos Werner, Georg Nickenig, Jan-Malte Sinning

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Multivessel versus culprit-only PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy and risk of stent thrombosis in patients undergoing complex PCI: a meta-analysis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mechanical circulatory support in ventricular arrhythmias.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikos WernerMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Herzzentrum Bonn, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, 53105, Bonn, Germany. nikos.werner@ukbonn.de.
Georg NickenigMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Herzzentrum Bonn, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, 53105, Bonn, Germany.
Jan-Malte SinningMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Herzzentrum Bonn, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, 53105, Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the percentage of patients with multivessel disease and multiple complex stenoses have significantly increased. One factor contributing to this increase is the proportion of elderly and very elderly patients who have been turned down by the Heart Team for surgical revascularization (Landes et al. in Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27375 , 2017; Waldo et al. in Circulation 130:2295-2301, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011541 , 2014). In addition, the marked increase in patients with significant comorbidities further contributes to the increase in patients referred to the interventional cardiologist for stenting procedures. Mostly, the complexity of these patients is characterized not only by their comorbidities but also by multivessel disease, bifurcation disease, left main disease, or stenoses of calcified or tortuous vessels, degenerated saphenous vein graft lesions, and thrombotic lesions (Kirtane et al. in Circulation 134:422-431, 2016; Gennaro Giustino et al. in JACC 86:1851-1864, 2016) These specific lesion types are typically associated with lower rates of procedural success and higher rates of recurrence or major adverse cardiac events (Kirtane et al. 2016) Coming along with this problem, virtually no study exists evaluating revascularization strategies, i.e. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or medical therapy alone in complex patients with complex coronary anatomy. Therefore, we are confronted with an increasing patient population that is understudied and potentially underserved. In the absence of robust, accurate, objective, and consistent evidence which could help us in decision-making (e.g. best revascularization strategy, complication prevention, post-interventional medical therapy), we have to stick to personal experience and patients' preferences. In this article, we provide an overview about common definition of complex PCI, general strategies to help decision-making in these patients, and give an overview about post-interventional medical treatment.

Indexed as

CardiologistsDecision MakingCoronary Artery DiseaseHumansPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPCI procedures

Identifiers

PMID29978353
OpenAlexW2830830522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.