Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29978314›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

Contribution of Eisenia andrei earthworms in pathogen reduction during vermicomposting.

Petra Procházková, Aleš Hanč, Jiří Dvořák, Radka Roubalová, Markéta Drešlová, Tereza Částková, Vladimír Šustr, František Škanta, Natividad Isabel Navarro Pacheco, Martin Bilej

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Mutual interactions of E. andrei earthworm and pathogens during the process of vermicomposting.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Petra ProcházkováLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic. kohler@biomed.cas.cz.
Aleš HančDepartment of Agro-Environmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Jiří DvořákLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
Radka RoubalováLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
Markéta DrešlováDepartment of Agro-Environmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Tereza ČástkováDepartment of Agro-Environmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Vladimír ŠustrInstitute of Soil Biology, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy, Na Sádkách 7, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
František ŠkantaLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
Natividad Isabel Navarro PachecoLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
Martin BilejLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
Czech Academy of Sciences · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZCzech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZInstitute of Soil Biology · CZ

Funding

CULS Prague under the CIGA project 20172018Institutional Research Concept RVO 61388971Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic under the NAZV project QJ1530034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vermicomposting is a process of degradation of biowaste which involves complex interactions between earthworms and microorganisms. This process lacks a thermophilic stage and thus, the possible presence of pathogens poses a potential health hazard. To assess the contribution of earthworms during the selective reduction of various pathogens, apple pomace substrate was artificially inoculated with Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., thermotolerant coliform bacteria, and Enterococci. The artificial bacterial load did not influence the weight, reproduction, or intestinal enzymatic activity of the earthworms, but it caused reversible histological changes to the epithelial layer and chloragogen tissue of their intestines. The reduction of pathogenic Enterococci and E. coli from the substrate was accelerated by earthworms (63-fold, 77-fold, and 840-fold for Enterococci and 6-fold, 36-fold, and 7-fold for E. coli inoculated substrates after 2, 4, and 6 weeks, respectively). Moreover, the rapid elimination of Salmonella spp. was supported by the upregulated expression of two pattern recognition receptors which bind lipopolysaccharide, coelomic cytolytic factor, and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein. Further, the microbiomes of the intestine and the composting substrate differed significantly. Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeSoil MicrobiologyAnimalsCompostingEscherichia coliOligochaetaBiowasteEarthwormEiseniaImmunityMicrobiomePathogenPattern recognition receptorVermicompost

Identifiers

PMID29978314
OpenAlexW2850283765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.