ArticlePediatric radiology2018
Preoperative sonographic evaluation of the defect size and the diaphragm rim in congenital diaphragmatic hernia - preliminary experience.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasonic Diagnosis of Intestinal Obstruction in Neonates-Original Article.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Bilateral Bochdalek Hernias Associated with Arnold-Chiari I Malformation.Case reports in radiology · 2020Article
- Ultrasound evaluation of right diaphragmatic eventration and hernia.Pediatric radiology · 2019Article
- Postnatal ultrasonography for evaluation of hernia sac of neonate with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Radiology case reports · 2019Article
- Three-dimensional reconstruction of defects in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a fetal MRI study.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSonographic assessment before congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair has rarely been studied.
objectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of preoperative ultrasound in measuring the defect size and in anticipating the presence of a rim and thereby to determine ultrasound's usefulness in informing the surgical approach for definitive repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of the medical records of seven children with left congenital diaphragmatic hernia who had undergone ultrasound and definitive repair between 2014 and 2017 at our institution.
resultsThe estimated defect size by ultrasound to the actual defect size measured intraoperatively for each case were as follows: 23 × 25 mm to 20 × 26 mm (case 1); 23 × 30 mm to 20 × 30 mm (case 2); 43 × 25 mm to 30 × 30 mm (case 3); 21 × 23 mm to 20 × 25 mm (case 4); 19 × 24 mm to 10 × 30 mm (case 5); 32 × 33 mm to 30 × 50 mm (case 6); and almost total absence to 40 × 50 mm (case 7). Presence or absence of each part of the diaphragm rim evaluated by ultrasound was almost identical with the actual intraoperative findings. According to the ultrasound findings, we performed a successful thoracoscopic repair in cases 1-5 with relatively small defects and presence of all parts of the rim or absence of only posterolateral rim.
conclusionThere was good concordance between ultrasound findings and operative findings regarding the size of the defect and presence or absence of the diaphragm rim.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29978294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.