ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018
Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Sodium fluoride in cardiovascular disorders: A systematic review.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Pooled it
- Molecular imaging of carotid artery atherosclerosis with PET: a systematic review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Pooled it
- PET/CT-Based Response Evaluation in Cancer-a Systematic Review of Design Issues.Molecular imaging and biology · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Association of Atherosclerosis [Molecular imaging and biology · 2026Article
- Review
- CT coronary angiography in the lipid clinic: a pilot study and lipidologist survey.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Long Axial Field of View PET: A New Era of Quantitative PET Imaging for Prospective Applications Beyond Classical Theranostics.PET clinics · 2025Review
- Preclinical evaluation of high-resolution CT,European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Reproducibility ofCurrent cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Why Current Detection of Vascular Calcification Falls Short and How to Improve on It.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Review
- Article
- The clinical value of quantitative cardiovascular molecular imaging: a step towards precision medicine.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Bilateral Carotid Artery Molecular Calcification Assessed by [Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Imaging in inflammatory arthritis: progress towards precision medicine.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2023Review
- Molecular imaging of arterial fibroblast activation protein: association with calcified plaque burden and cardiovascular risk factors.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and PET/CT: From Molecular Mechanisms to Potential Molecular Imaging Targets.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Developing a novel positronium biomarker for cardiac myxoma imaging.EJNMMI physics · 2023Article
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The early detection of atherosclerotic disease is vital to the effective prevention and management of life-threatening cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarctions and cerebrovascular accidents. Given the potential for positron emission tomography (PET) to visualize atherosclerosis earlier in the disease process than anatomic imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), this application of PET imaging has been the focus of intense scientific inquiry. Although
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.