Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29978103›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary research2017

Poultry in Poland as

Monika Szymańska-Czerwińska, Agata Mitura, Kinga Zaręba, Christiane Schnee, Andrzej Koncicki, Krzysztof Niemczuk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Severe pneumonia caused byFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Chlamydia gallinacea in Brazilian backyard chicken farms.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. New insight on chlamydiae.Journal of veterinary research · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Molecular characterization ofEpidemiology and infection · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Monika Szymańska-CzerwińskaDepartment of Cattle and Sheep Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland.
Agata MituraDepartment of Cattle and Sheep Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland.
Kinga ZarębaDepartment of Cattle and Sheep Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland.
Christiane SchneeInstitute of Molecular Pathogenesis, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, 07 743 Jena, Germany.
Andrzej KoncickiDepartment of Poultry Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.
Krzysztof NiemczukDepartment of Cattle and Sheep Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland.
National Veterinary Research Institute · PLFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe study was conducted to investigate the prevalence and genetic diversity of MATERIAL AND

methodsMolecular diagnostic methods followed by sequencing and strain isolation were used on cloacal/faecal swabs collected from 182 apparently healthy poultry flocks including chickens, turkeys, ducks, and geese. Serum samples obtained from people exposed (study group) and non-exposed (control group) to birds were tested by complement fixation test to acquire data on

resultsOverall, 15.9% of the tested flocks were

conclusionThe obtained results confirm that chlamydiae are common among chicken flocks in Poland with

Indexed as

Chlamydia abortusChlamydia gallinaceachlamydiosisPolandpoultry

Identifiers

PMID29978103
PMCPMC5937338
OpenAlexW2782420498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.