Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29978040›Full record

ArticleScience advances2018

A strategy for the conservation of biodiversity on mid-ocean ridges from deep-sea mining.

Daniel C Dunn, Cindy L Van Dover, Ron J Etter, Craig R Smith, Lisa A Levin, Telmo Morato, Ana Colaço, Andrew C Dale, Andrey V Gebruk, Kristina M Gjerde and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Conservation implications of low contemporary connectivity along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge in hydrothermal vent gastropods.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Seamount larval dispersal networks: A potential strategy for conserving ecological connectivity from deep-sea mining.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessing the extinction risk of insular, understudied marine species.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Daniel C DunnMarine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Division of Marine Science and Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8932-0681
Cindy L Van DoverDivision of Marine Science and Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, NC 28516, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9845-8391
Ron J EtterBiology Department, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02125, USA.
Craig R SmithDepartment of Oceanography, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3976-0889
Lisa A LevinCenter for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation and Integrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2858-8622
Telmo MoratoIMAR Instituto do Mar, Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, and MARE Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2393-4773
Ana ColaçoIMAR Instituto do Mar, Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, and MARE Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6462-5670
Andrew C DaleScottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban, Argyll, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9256-7770
Andrey V GebrukShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Kristina M GjerdeIUCN Global Marine and Polar Programme and World Commission on Protected Areas, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9025-7632
Patrick N HalpinMarine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Division of Marine Science and Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5845-3588
Kerry L HowellDeep-Sea Conservation Research Unit, School of Biological and Marine Sciences, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth, UK.
David JohnsonSeascape Consultants Ltd., Romsey, UK.
José Angel A PerezCentro de Ciências Tecnológicas da Terra e do Mar, Universidade do Vale do Itajaí, Itajaí, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6431-5237
Marta Chantal RibeiroFaculty of Law, Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7937-988X
Heiko StuckasSenckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5690-0994
Philip WeaverSeascape Consultants Ltd., Romsey, UK.
SEMPIA Workshop Participants

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mineral exploitation has spread from land to shallow coastal waters and is now planned for the offshore, deep seabed. Large seafloor areas are being approved for exploration for seafloor mineral deposits, creating an urgent need for regional environmental management plans. Networks of areas where mining and mining impacts are prohibited are key elements of these plans. We adapt marine reserve design principles to the distinctive biophysical environment of mid-ocean ridges, offer a framework for design and evaluation of these networks to support conservation of benthic ecosystems on mid-ocean ridges, and introduce projected climate-induced changes in the deep sea to the evaluation of reserve design. We enumerate a suite of metrics to measure network performance against conservation targets and network design criteria promulgated by the Convention on Biological Diversity. We apply these metrics to network scenarios on the northern and equatorial Mid-Atlantic Ridge, where contractors are exploring for seafloor massive sulfide (SMS) deposits. A latitudinally distributed network of areas performs well at (i) capturing ecologically important areas and 30 to 50% of the spreading ridge areas, (ii) replicating representative areas, (iii) maintaining along-ridge population connectivity, and (iv) protecting areas potentially less affected by climate-related changes. Critically, the network design is adaptive, allowing for refinement based on new knowledge and the location of mining sites, provided that design principles and conservation targets are maintained. This framework can be applied along the global mid-ocean ridge system as a precautionary measure to protect biodiversity and ecosystem function from impacts of SMS mining.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesClimate ChangeEcosystemOceans and Seas

Identifiers

PMID29978040
PMCPMC6031377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.