Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29977973›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2018

Immunization Mandates, Vaccination Coverage, and Exemption Rates in the United States.

Jana Shaw, Emily M Mader, Brittany E Bennett, Olesya K Vernyi-Kellogg, Y Tony Yang, Christopher P Morley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A review of immunization legislation for children in English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean countries.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Meningococcal disease and vaccination in college students.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. High Deductible Health Plans and Use of Free Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jana ShawDepartment of Pediatrics, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Golisano Children's Hospital, Syracuse, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-0955-3392
Emily M MaderDepartment of Family Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Brittany E BennettDepartment of Family Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Olesya K Vernyi-KelloggLegal Resource Center for Public Health Policy, 500 W Baltimore St, Baltimore, Maryland.
Y Tony YangDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.
Christopher P MorleyDepartment of Family Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
SUNY Upstate Medical University · USCenter for Medical Technology Policy · USGeorge Mason University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination coverage among children entering kindergarten in the United States is high, but interstate variations exist. The relationship between state immunization laws and vaccination coverage has not been fully assessed. We evaluated associations of state laws on both measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) and diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTaP) vaccination coverage and exemptions to school immunization requirements.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective, longitudinal analysis of the effect of state immunization laws on vaccination coverage and exemptions among US kindergarteners from SY 2008 to SY 2014. The primary outcome measures were state-level kindergarten entry vaccination coverage rates for 2-dose MMR and 4-dose DTaP vaccines. Secondary outcome measures included rates of state-level exemptions (ie, medical, religious, philosophical) to school immunization requirements.

resultsWe found that state policies that refer to Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations were associated with 3.5% and 2.8% increases in MMR and DTaP vaccination rates. Health Department-led parental education was associated with 5.1% and 4.5% increases in vaccination rates. Permission of religious and philosophical exemptions was associated with 2.3% and 1.9% decreases in MMR and DTaP coverage, respectively, and a 1.5% increase in both total exemptions and nonmedical exemptions, respectively.

conclusionsWe found higher vaccination coverage and lower nonmedical exemption rates for MMR and DTaP vaccines in states adopting Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices guidelines for school entry. Adherence to these best practices was a successful strategy to increase vaccination coverage and reduce vaccination exemptions.

Indexed as

childrencoverageexemptionsimmunizationlaw

Identifiers

PMID29977973
PMCPMC6016709
OpenAlexW2805555500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.