ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2018
Modeling Dynamic Human Behavioral Changes in Animal Disease Models: Challenges and Opportunities for Addressing Bias.
Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Swine veterinarians' awareness, attitudes, and intention to recommend precision livestock farming technologies to clients.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Farmers' knowledge of African swine fever disease prevention practice: A case of biosecurity in small-scale pig farms in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam.Open veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Integrating behavioural science and epidemiology to improve early detection of zoonotic swine influenza in the Netherlands.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Factors affecting highly pathogenic avian influenza vaccination practices at poultry farms in Tra Vinh, Vietnam.Open veterinary journal · 2024Article
- Mechanistic modelling for African swine fever transmission in the Republic of Korea.Journal of veterinary science · 2023Article
- The attitude-behaviour gap in biosecurity: Applying social theories to understand the relationships between commercial chicken farmers' attitudes and behaviours.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- How growers make decisions impacts plant disease control.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Modelling livestock infectious disease control policy under differing social perspectives on vaccination behaviour.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Determinants of farmers' biosecurity mindset: A social-ecological model using systems thinking.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Connecting livestock disease dynamics to human learning and biosecurity decisions.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Effects of message delivery on cross-cultural biosecurity compliance: Insights from experimental simulations.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Accounting for farmers' control decisions in a model of pathogen spread through animal trade.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Mental Model of Malaysian Pig Farmers in Implementing Disease Prevention and Control Practices.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- Article
- Simulating human behavioral changes in livestock production systems during an epidemic: The case of the US beef cattle industry.PloS one · 2021Article
- Understanding Farmers' Behavior and Their Decision-Making Process in the Context of Cattle Diseases: A Review of Theories and Approaches.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Review
- Poultry farmer response to disease outbreaks in smallholder farming systems in southern Vietnam.eLife · 2020Article
- Effects of Social Cues on Biosecurity Compliance in Livestock Facilities: Evidence From Experimental Simulations.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
- Socially vs. Privately Optimal Control of Livestock Diseases: A Case for Integration of Epidemiology and Economics.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
- Variable Cognition in ABM Decision-Making: An Application to Livestock Vaccine Choice.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past several decades, infectious disease modeling has become an essential tool for creating counterfactual scenarios that allow the effectiveness of different disease control policies to be evaluated prior to implementation in the real world. For livestock diseases, these models have become increasingly sophisticated as researchers have gained access to rich national livestock traceability databases, which enables inclusion of explicit spatial and temporal patterns in animal movements through network-based approaches. However, there are still many limitations in how we currently model animal disease dynamics. Critical among these is that many models make the assumption that human behaviors remain constant over time. As many studies have shown, livestock owners change their behaviors around trading, on-farm biosecurity, and disease management in response to complex factors such as increased awareness of disease risks, pressure to conform with social expectations, and the direct imposition of new national animal health regulations; all of which may significantly influence how a disease spreads within and between farms. Failing to account for these dynamics may produce a substantial layer of bias in infectious disease models, yet surprisingly little is currently known about the effects on model inferences. Here, we review the growing evidence on why these assumptions matter. We summarize the current knowledge about farmers' behavioral change in on-farm biosecurity and livestock trading practices and highlight the knowledge gaps that prohibit these behavioral changes from being incorporated into disease modeling frameworks. We suggest this knowledge gap can be filled only by more empirical longitudinal studies on farmers' behavioral change as well as theoretical modeling studies that can help to identify human behavioral changes that are important in disease transmission dynamics. Moreover, we contend it is time to shift our research approach: from modeling a single disease to modeling interactions between multiple diseases and from modeling a single farmer behavior to modeling interdependencies between multiple behaviors. In order to solve these challenges, there is a strong need for interdisciplinary collaboration across a wide range of fields including animal health, epidemiology, sociology, and animal welfare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.