ArticleAllergy & rhinology (Providence, R.I.)
Amlodipine-induced angioedema: An unusual complication of a common medication.
Article in Allergy & rhinology (Providence, R.I.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cutaneous effects of antihypertensive drugs: A comprehensive narrative review of side effects, management, and prevention.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Review
- Amlodipine-Associated Angioedema: An Integrated Pharmacovigilance Assessment Using Disproportionality and Interaction Analysis and Case Reviews.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Recurrence of unilateral angioedema of the tongue: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Effects of different enantiomers of amlodipine on lipid profiles and vasomotor factors in atherosclerotic rabbits.Open life sciences · 2021Article
- Clinical Features and Disease Course of Primary Angioedema Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2020Article
- Angioedema secondary to amlodipine and lisinopril: a documented progression.BMJ case reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypersensitivity reactions to dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCB) are exceedingly rare, although sporadic reports of isolated angioedema seem to be gradually increasing in frequency. We present a case of angioedema likely triggered by amlodipine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.