Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29977647›Full record

ArticleAllergy & rhinology (Providence, R.I.)

The Eyes Have It: Eyelid Swelling and Rash in a 79-year-old Woman With Macular Degeneration.

Renee S Kleris, Anjeni Keswani, Patricia Lugar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy & rhinology (Providence, R.I.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Retinal vasculitis following intravitreal pegcetacoplan administration.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renee S KlerisDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Anjeni KeswaniDepartment of Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia.
Patricia LugarDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke Medical Center · USGeorge Washington University · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGYT32AI007062 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI David B. Peden, John W. Sleasman · 1985 to 2026
$6.1M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA 79-year-old woman with macular degeneration was referred to the Allergy/Immunology clinic for the evaluation of a potential allergy to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatments. The patient developed urticaria and eyelid swelling immediately following a retinal injection of aflibercept, which she had previously tolerated. She previously had allergic reactions following ranibizumab and bevacizumab injections. Injections of anti-VEGF treatments were discontinued given concern for allergy with progression of the patient's disease.

objectiveTo assess the culprit medication(s) responsible for hypersensitivity reactions following anti-VEGF injections for macular degeneration.

methodsMedication records were reviewed for each retinal injection. All medications used in each procedure, including the anti-VEGF therapy (aflibercept), topical anesthetics (tetracaine and proparacaine hydrochloride), and antiseptic (povidine), were evaluated with skin testing. She was additionally tested for alternative anti-VEGF therapies (ranibizumab and bevacizumab) as she was thought to have allergies to these agents by prior history. A test dose challenge was completed for aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab.

resultsSkin prick and intradermal testing were negative to aflibercept, ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and povidine. Intradermal testing was positive to tetracaine and proparacaine hydrochloride. The patient passed test dose challenges to aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab. Due to her positive hypersensitivity testing to 2 ester anesthetics, the patient underwent skin prick and intradermal testing to the amide anesthetic, lidocaine. This was negative and the patient tolerated a graded challenge to lidocaine. She was deemed to have an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated hypersensitivity to ester-type local anesthetics. She successfully resumed anti-VEGF therapy with an amide local anesthetic.

conclusionsThe reason for this consult was the concern for hypersensitivity to a biologic anti-VEGF medication. The culprit allergen, the local anesthetic, could have been overlooked without an assessment of all medications used during the procedure. This case highlights the importance of a thorough allergy evaluation of all medications used during procedures to determine the causative agent.

Indexed as

anaphylaxisangioedemaanti-VEGF treatmentcontact dermatitisdrug allergyintradermal testinglocal anesthetic allergyskin prick testingurticaria

Identifiers

PMID29977647
PMCPMC6028157
OpenAlexW2810651604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.