ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2018
Clinical application and cases examples of a new treatment algorithm for treating thoracic and lumbar spine trauma.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designReview of illustrative cases of a new algorithm to help in the treatment decision of thoracolumbar spine trauma.
objectivesTo illustrate the use of the new algorithm for managing thoracic and lumbar spine trauma. SETTINGS: Recently, a new algorithm for helping in the decision of the best treatment modality for thoracolumbar spine trauma (TLST) was published. The algorithm considers injury morphology, neurological status, clinical status (pain and disability), and also multimodal radiological evaluation (MMRE) in the decision for non-operative versus operative treatment for TLST. Injuries were classified in three groups: (1) stable injuries, (2) potentially unstable injuries/ delayed instability, or (3) clearly unstable injuries.
methodsCases examples of the algorithm application were presented and discussed.
resultsStable injuries (minor fractures without instability) are non-surgically treated; potentially unstable injuries or associated with delayed instability may be initially managed non-surgically and operative treatment is an option, especially in the setting of important pain, deformity or a new neurological deficit. Clearly unstable injuries are treated surgically as soon as possible to avoid neurological worsening, severe pain, and/ or progressive spinal deformity.
conclusionsClinical examples of TLST were presented, discussed and classified as stable, potentially unstable and clearly unstable injuries. Further studies addressing the reliability and safety of this algorithm are necessary.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.