Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29977565›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2018

Rapid loss of seed viability in

Rob van Treuren, Noor Bas, Jan Kodde, Steven P C Groot, Chris Kik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Viability and integrity ofConservation physiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Why Seed Physiology Is Important for Genebanking.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rob van TreurenCentre for Genetic Resources, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Noor BasCentre for Genetic Resources, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Jan KoddeDepartment of Bioscience, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Steven P C GrootDepartment of Bioscience, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Chris KikCentre for Genetic Resources, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genebanks aim to optimize their storage conditions in order to postpone seed ageing as long as possible. As most genebanks have a relatively short life history, empirical data about seed longevity during

Indexed as

Cerealsgenebanksgerminationseed longevityseed viabilitystorage temperature

Identifiers

PMID29977565
PMCPMC6016650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.