Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29977548›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2018

What matters in patient-centered medical home transformation: Whole system evaluation outcomes of the Brown Primary Care Transformation Initiative.

Roberta E Goldman, Joanna Brown, Patricia Stebbins, Donna R Parker, Victoria Adewale, Renee Shield, Mary B Roberts, Charles B Eaton, Jeffrey M Borkan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Roberta E GoldmanDepartment of Family Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7801-0530
Joanna BrownDepartment of Family Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Patricia StebbinsDepartment of Family Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Donna R ParkerDepartment of Family Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Victoria AdewaleDepartment of Family Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Renee ShieldSchool of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Mary B RobertsCenter for Primary Care & Prevention, Brown University, Pawtucket, RI, USA.
Charles B EatonDepartment of Family Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Jeffrey M BorkanDepartment of Family Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatient-centered medical home transformation initiatives for enhancing team-based, patient-centered primary care are widespread in the United States. However, there remain large gaps in our understanding of these efforts. This article reports findings from a contextual, whole system evaluation study of a transformation intervention at eight primary care teaching practice sites in Rhode Island. It provides a picture of system changes from the perspective of providers, staff, and patients in these practices.

methodsQuantitative/qualitative evaluation methods include patient, provider, and staff surveys and qualitative interviews; practice observations; and focus groups with the intervention facilitation team.

resultsPatient satisfaction in the practices was high. Patients could describe observable elements of patient-centered medical home functioning, but they lacked explicit awareness of the patient-centered medical home model, and their activation decreased over time. Providers' and staff's emotional exhaustion and depersonalization increased slightly over the course of the intervention from baseline to follow-up, and personal accomplishment decreased slightly. Providers and staff expressed appreciation for the patient-centered medical home as an ideal model, variously implemented some important patient-centered medical home components, increased their understanding of patient-centered medical home as more than specific isolated parts, and recognized their evolving work roles in the medical home. However, frustration with implementation barriers and the added work burden they associated with patient-centered medical home persisted.

conclusionPatient-centered medical home transformation is disruptive to practices, requiring enduring commitment of leadership and personnel at every level, yet the model continues to hold out promise for improved delivery of patient-centered primary care.

Indexed as

evaluation outcomeshealth-care deliveryhealth services deliveryPatient-centered medical homeprimary careprimary care transformationquantitative and qualitative evaluation

Identifiers

PMID29977548
PMCPMC6024270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.