ArticleTherapeutic advances in psychopharmacology2018
Amisulpride augmentation of clozapine for treatment-refractory schizophrenia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Article in Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Amisulpride augmentation therapy improves cognitive performance and psychopathology in clozapine-resistant treatment-refractory schizophrenia: a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Military Medical Research · 2022Trial
- Effectiveness of amisulpride augmentation versus other antipsychotics in clozapine-treated adolescents: a real-world retrospective study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Following the Action of Atypical Antipsychotic Clozapine and Possible Prediction of Treatment Response in Schizophrenia.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The value of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with amisulpride enhancement olanzapine therapy for resistant treatment-refractory schizophrenia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Review
- Amisulpride Augmentation of Clozapine in Clozapine-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Case Series.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2022Article
- Possible pharmacogenetic factors in clozapine treatment failure: a case report.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2021Article
- Characteristics and Spectrum of Cardiotoxicity Induced by Various Antipsychotics: A Real-World Study From 2015 to 2020 Based on FAERS.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- A randomized double-blind controlled trial to assess the benefits of amisulpride and olanzapine combination treatment versus each monotherapy in acutely ill schizophrenia patients (COMBINE): methods and design.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2020Article
- The physical health and side-effect monitoring of patients prescribed clozapine: data from a clinical audit conducted in UK mental health services.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA second antipsychotic is commonly added to clozapine to treat refractory schizophrenia, notwithstanding the limited evidence to support such practice.
methodsThe efficacy and adverse effects of this pharmacological strategy were examined in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week randomized trial of clozapine augmentation with amisulpride, involving 68 adults with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and persistent symptoms despite a predefined trial of clozapine.
resultsThere were no statistically significant differences between the amisulpride and placebo groups on the primary outcome measure (clinical response defined as a 20% reduction in total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score) or other mental state measures. However, the trial under recruited and was therefore underpowered to detect differences in the primary outcome, meaning that acceptance of the null hypothesis carries an increased risk of type II error. The findings suggested that amisulpride-treated participants were more likely to fulfil the clinical response criterion, odds ratio 1.17 (95% confidence interval 0.40-3.42) and have a greater reduction in negative symptoms, but these numerical differences were not statistically significant and only evident at 12 weeks. A significantly higher proportion of participants in the amisulpride group had at least one adverse event compared with the control group (
conclusionsTreatment for more than 6 weeks may be required for an adequate trial of clozapine augmentation with amisulpride. The greater side-effect burden associated with this treatment strategy highlights the need for safety and tolerability monitoring, including vigilance for indicators of cardiac abnormalities, when it is used in either a clinical or research setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.