Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29977484›Full record

ReviewJournal of healthcare engineering2018

Raman Spectroscopy and Imaging for Cancer Diagnosis.

Sishan Cui, Shuo Zhang, Shuhua Yue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Single color digital H&E staining with In-and-Out Net.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  11. Multi-Wavelength Raman Differentiation of Malignant Skin Neoplasms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sishan CuiSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China.
Shuo ZhangSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China.
Shuhua YueSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1830-008X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Raman scattering has long been used to analyze chemical compositions in biological systems. Owing to its high chemical specificity and noninvasive detection capability, Raman scattering has been widely employed in cancer screening, diagnosis, and intraoperative surgical guidance in the past ten years. In order to overcome the weak signal of spontaneous Raman scattering, coherent Raman scattering and surface-enhanced Raman scattering have been developed and recently applied in the field of cancer research. This review focuses on innovative studies of the use of Raman scattering in cancer diagnosis and their potential to transition from bench to bedside.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSpectrum Analysis, RamanAnimalsHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID29977484
PMCPMC6011081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.