Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29977397›Full record

ReviewBeilstein journal of organic chemistry2018

Oligonucleotide analogues with cationic backbone linkages.

Melissa Meng, Christian Ducho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Beilstein journal of organic chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Mesyl phosphoramidate backbone modified antisense oligonucleotides targeting miR-21 with enhanced in vivo therapeutic potency.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Automated Synthesis and Purification of Guanidine-Backbone Oligonucleotides.Current protocols in nucleic acid chemistry · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Bridged Nucleic Acids Reloaded.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Melissa MengDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Saarland University, Campus C2 3, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Christian DuchoDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Saarland University, Campus C2 3, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0629-9993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Their unique ability to selectively bind specific nucleic acid sequences makes oligonucleotides promising bioactive agents. However, modifications of the nucleic acid structure are an essential prerequisite for their application in vivo or even in cellulo. The oligoanionic backbone structure of oligonucleotides mainly hampers their ability to penetrate biological barriers such as cellular membranes. Hence, particular attention has been given to structural modifications of oligonucleotides which reduce their overall number of negative charges. One such approach is the site-specific replacement of the negatively charged phosphate diester linkage with alternative structural motifs which are positively charged at physiological pH, thus resulting in zwitterionic or even oligocationic backbone structures. This review provides a general overview of this concept and summarizes research on four according artificial backbone linkages: aminoalkylated phosphoramidates (and related systems), guanidinium groups,

Indexed as

backbone modificationscationsDNAoligonucleotideszwitterions

Identifiers

PMID29977397
PMCPMC6009206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.