ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Identification of differential modules in ankylosing spondylitis using systemic module inference and the attract method.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unraveling the mechanisms underlying diabetic cataracts: insights from Mendelian randomization analysis.Redox report : communications in free radical research · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to identify differential modules in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) by integrating network analysis, module inference and the attract method. To achieve this objective, four steps were conducted. The first step was disease objective network (DON) for AS, and healthy objective network (HON) inference dependent on gene expression data, protein-protein interaction networks and Spearman's correlation coefficient. In the second step, module detection was performed by utilizing a clique-merging algorithm, which comprised of exploring maximal cliques by clique algorithm and refining or merging maximal cliques with a high overlap. The third part was seed module evaluation through module pair matches by Jaccard score and module correlation density (MCD) calculation. Finally, in the fourth step, differential modules between the AS and healthy groups were identified based on a gene set enrichment analysis-analysis of variance model in the attract method. There were 5,301 nodes and 28,176 interactions both in DON and HON. A total of 20 and 21 modules were detected for the AS and healthy group, respectively. Notably, six seed modules across two groups were identified with Jaccard score ≥0.5, and these were ranked in descending order of differential MCD (Δ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.