ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2018
Closed Or Open after Source Control Laparotomy for Severe Complicated Intra-Abdominal Sepsis (the COOL trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03163095 (Closed Versus Open Abdomen in the Surgical Treatment of Severe Secondary Peritonitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Closed Versus Open Abdomen in the Surgical Treatment of Severe Secondary Peritonitis: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Contemporary management of the open abdomen: standards, challenges, and future directions.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy after emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Pooled it
- Vacuum-assisted closure or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand in patients with secondary peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Pooled it
- [Early source control of infection in patients seen in the emergency department: a systematic review].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024Pooled it
- Negative pressure wound therapy for managing the open abdomen in non-trauma patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- 2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021Guideline
- 2020 update of the WSES guidelines for the management of acute colonic diverticulitis in the emergency setting.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2020Guideline
- Perforated and bleeding peptic ulcer: WSES guidelines.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2020Guideline
- The unrestricted global effort to complete the COOL trial.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2023Trial
- Ethical considerations in conducting surgical research in severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2019Trial
- Serial Bogota bag tightening: A pragmatic advance in open abdomen management for resource-limited settings.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Low-cost dynamic fascial traction using serial Bogota bag tightening in open abdomen management: A prospective randomized study.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Personalized Approaches to Patients with Intra-Abdominal Infections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Acute Left-Side Colonic Diverticulitis: A Historical Cohort Study on the Optimization of Non-Operative Management Outcomes and Anastomosis Rate After Sigmoid Resection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Vacuum-Assisted Closure Significantly Reduces Surgical Postoperative Complications Compared With Primary Abdominal Closure in Patients With Secondary Peritonitis: A Comparative Retrospective Study.World journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Increased use of damage control laparotomy for emergency small bowel or colon surgery: does it affect patient outcomes?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Article
- The effect of damage control laparotomy on surgical-site infection risks after emergent intestinal surgery.Surgery · 2024Article
- Intra-abdominal infections survival guide: a position statement by the Global Alliance For Infections In Surgery.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2024Review
- Revolution in sepsis: a symptoms-based to a systems-based approach?Journal of biomedical science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) has an increasing incidence with mortality rates over 80% in some settings. Mortality typically results from disruption of the gastrointestinal tract, progressive and self-perpetuating bio-mediator generation, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ failure. Principles of treatment include early antibiotic administration and operative source control. A further therapeutic option may be open abdomen (OA) management with active negative peritoneal pressure therapy (ANPPT) to remove inflammatory ascites and ameliorate the systemic damage from SCIAS. Although there is now a biologic rationale for such an intervention as well as non-standardized and erratic clinical utilization, this remains a novel therapy with potential side effects and clinical equipoise. Methods: The Closed Or Open after Laparotomy (COOL) study will constitute a prospective randomized controlled trial that will randomly allocate eligible surgical patients intra-operatively to either formal closure of the fascia or use of the OA with application of an ANPTT dressing. Patients will be eligible if they have free uncontained intra-peritoneal contamination and physiologic derangements exemplified by septic shock OR a Predisposition-Infection-Response-Organ Dysfunction Score ≥ 3 or a World-Society-of-Emergency-Surgery-Sepsis-Severity-Score ≥ 8. The primary outcome will be 90-day survival. Secondary outcomes will be logistical, physiologic, safety, bio-mediators, microbiological, quality of life, and health-care costs. Secondary outcomes will include days free of ICU, ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and hospital at 30 days from the index laparotomy. Physiologic secondary outcomes will include changes in intensive care unit illness severity scores after laparotomy. Bio-mediator outcomes for participating centers will involve measurement of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10, procalcitonin, activated protein C (APC), high-mobility group box protein-1, complement factors, and mitochondrial DNA. Economic outcomes will comprise standard costing for utilization of health-care resources. Discussion: Although facial closure after SCIAS is considered the current standard of care, many reports are suggesting that OA management may improve outcomes in these patients. This trial will be powered to demonstrate a mortality difference in this highly lethal and morbid condition to ensure critically ill patients are receiving the best care possible and not being harmed by inappropriate therapies based on opinion only. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03163095.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.