Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29977071›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Using machine learning tools for protein database biocuration assistance.

Caroline König, Ilmira Shaim, Alfredo Vellido, Enrique Romero, René Alquézar, Jesús Giraldo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Caroline KönigIDEAI Research Center, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, UPC BarcelonaTech, 08034, Barcelona, Spain.
Ilmira ShaimIDEAI Research Center, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, UPC BarcelonaTech, 08034, Barcelona, Spain.
Alfredo VellidoIDEAI Research Center, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, UPC BarcelonaTech, 08034, Barcelona, Spain. avellido@cs.upc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9843-1911
Enrique RomeroIDEAI Research Center, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, UPC BarcelonaTech, 08034, Barcelona, Spain.
René AlquézarIDEAI Research Center, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, UPC BarcelonaTech, 08034, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6420-0517
Jesús GiraldoInstitut de Neurociències - Unitat de Bioestadìstica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain. jesus.giraldo@uab.es.
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya · ESBiomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness) SAF2014-58396-RMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness) TIN2016-79576-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biocuration in the omics sciences has become paramount, as research in these fields rapidly evolves towards increasingly data-dependent models. As a result, the management of web-accessible publicly-available databases becomes a central task in biological knowledge dissemination. One relevant challenge for biocurators is the unambiguous identification of biological entities. In this study, we illustrate the adequacy of machine learning methods as biocuration assistance tools using a publicly available protein database as an example. This database contains information on G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs), which are part of eukaryotic cell membranes and relevant in cell communication as well as major drug targets in pharmacology. These receptors are characterized according to subtype labels. Previous analysis of this database provided evidence that some of the receptor sequences could be affected by a case of label noise, as they appeared to be too consistently misclassified by machine learning methods. Here, we extend our analysis to recent and quite substantially modified new versions of the database and reveal their now extremely accurate labeling using several machine learning models and different transformations of the unaligned sequences. These findings support the adequacy of our proposed method to identify problematic labeling cases as a tool for database biocuration.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinMachine LearningData CurationReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSupport Vector MachineReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID29977071
PMCPMC6033909
OpenAlexW2810729566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.