Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29976967›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2018

The uncertain fate of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) pediatric research portfolio.

Daniel P Gitterman, W Scott Langford, William W Hay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neuroinflammation and Pediatric Chronic Pain - A Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Doing a PhD: ten golden rules.Pediatric research · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Value of children in our world.Pediatric research · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel P GittermanDepartment of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. danielg@email.unc.edu.
W Scott LangfordDepartment of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
William W HayDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe amount of federal dollars allocated to improving the health of our pediatric population can serve as an indicator of the priority placed on child well-being. Although Congress has established novel mechanisms that marginally increase pediatric research funding, the pediatric research portfolio is facing an increasingly uncertain fate.

methodsThis work examines pediatric, perinatal and pediatric research initiative (PRI) spending using data collected by the NIH that uses the novel research, condition and disease categorization system. Further, this work reports on recent policy developments in pediatric biomedical research and offers recommendations to insulate this portfolio from future uncertainty.

resultsFederal support for pediatric research has declined with average annual growth rates of NIH pediatric spending dropping from 12.8% (FY 1998-2003) to 1.7% (FY 2004-2015). After taking into account Biomedical Research and Development Price Index growth, the pediatric research portfolio's purchasing power has declined by 15.9% (FY 2004-2015).

conclusionFederal support for pediatric biomedical research has plateaued in nominal terms and declined significantly in real terms. Future congressional action will be necessary to protect gains and to expand the capacity of the pediatric portfolio.

Indexed as

Research Support as TopicAdolescentBiomedical ResearchChildChild, PreschoolChild WelfareHealth PolicyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)PediatricsUncertaintyUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.