Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29976952›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Comparison between renal denervation and metoprolol on the susceptibility of ventricular arrhythmias in rats with myocardial infarction.

Wanying Jiang, Chu Chen, Junyu Huo, Dasheng Lu, Zhixin Jiang, Jie Geng, Hai Xu, Qijun Shan

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Effects of renal denervation on the incidence and severity of cardiovascular diseases.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Review
  4. Renal denervation: a key approach to hypertension and cardiovascular disease.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wanying JiangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Chu ChenDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Junyu HuoDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Dasheng LuDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241000, China.
Zhixin JiangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Jie GengDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Hai XuDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Qijun ShanDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China. qjshan@njmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-8540-0956
Jiangsu Province Hospital · CNWannan Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are the leading cause of sudden cardiac death in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). We sought to compare effects of renal denervation (RDN) and metoprolol on VAs after MI. Fifty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent ligation of left anterior descending coronary artery to induce MI, while 6 rats served as Control. Metoprolol was given 20 mg/kg/day for 5 weeks after MI surgery. RDN/Sham-RDN procedure was performed at 1 week after MI. At 5 weeks after MI, electrical programmed stimulation (EPS) was performed in all groups for evaluation of VAs. After EPS, heart and kidneys were harvested. Compared with MI group, RDN and metoprolol significantly decreased the incidence of VAs, and RDN is superior to metoprolol. Compared with metoprolol group, Masson staining showed that RDN significantly reduced the myocardial fibrosis. Both RDN and metoprolol decreased the protein expression of connexin43 (Cx43) compared with MI group, while only RDN lighted this decrease remarkably. Immunohistochemical staining of Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and growth associated protein 43 (GAP43) revealed that RDN and metoprolol had similar effect on reducing densities of sympathetic nerve in infarction border zone. According to this study, RDN is more effective in reducing VAs than metoprolol in ischemic cardiomyopathy model.

Indexed as

AnimalsArrhythmias, CardiacConnexin 43DenervationDisease Models, AnimalDrug Administration ScheduleElectric StimulationKidneyMaleMetoprololMyocardial InfarctionRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySympathetic Nervous SystemTreatment OutcomeConnexin 43Gja1 protein, ratMetoprolol

Identifiers

PMID29976952
PMCPMC6033884
OpenAlexW2809815853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.