ArticleScientific reports2018
Discovery of Mcl-1 inhibitors from integrated high throughput and virtual screening.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the Functional Dependence and Inhibition of the Bcl‑2 Pro-Survival Proteins in a Wide Spectrum of Cancers toward Precision Medicine.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- The inhibitory effects ofIn silico pharmacology · 2025Article
- Identification and Evaluation of Reversible Covalent Binders to Cys55 of Bfl-1 from a DNA-Encoded Chemical Library Screen.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2024Article
- Article
- Drug Repurposing: Deferasirox Inhibits the Anti-Apoptotic Activity of Mcl-1.Drug design, development and therapy · 2021Article
- Rationally Designed Polypharmacology: α-Helix Mimetics as Dual Inhibitors of the Oncoproteins Mcl-1 and HDM2.ChemMedChem · 2020Article
- Online informatics resources to facilitate cancer target and chemical probe discovery.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2020Review
- Discovery and Characterization of 2,5-Substituted Benzoic Acid Dual Inhibitors of the Anti-apoptotic Mcl-1 and Bfl-1 Proteins.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) represent important and promising therapeutic targets that are associated with the regulation of various molecular pathways, particularly in cancer. Although they were once considered "undruggable," the recent advances in screening strategies, structure-based design, and elucidating the nature of hot spots on PPI interfaces, have led to the discovery and development of successful small-molecule inhibitors. In this report, we are describing an integrated high-throughput and computational screening approach to enable the discovery of small-molecule PPI inhibitors of the anti-apoptotic protein, Mcl-1. Applying this strategy, followed by biochemical, biophysical, and biological characterization, nineteen new chemical scaffolds were discovered and validated as Mcl-1 inhibitors. A novel series of Mcl-1 inhibitors was designed and synthesized based on the identified difuryl-triazine core scaffold and structure-activity studies were undertaken to improve the binding affinity to Mcl-1. Compounds with improved in vitro binding potency demonstrated on-target activity in cell-based studies. The obtained results demonstrate that structure-based analysis complements the experimental high-throughput screening in identifying novel PPI inhibitor scaffolds and guides follow-up medicinal chemistry efforts. Furthermore, our work provides an example that can be applied to the analysis of available screening data against numerous targets in the PubChem BioAssay Database, leading to the identification of promising lead compounds, fuelling drug discovery pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.