Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29976893›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2018

General Practitioners' Views on the Acceptability and Applicability of Using Quality Indicators as an Intervention to Reduce Unnecessary Prescription of Antibiotics in Four South American Countries.

Inés Urbiztondo, Sandi Michele de Oliveira, Nieves Hernández-Flores, Lidia Caballero, Miguel Angel Suarez, Lars Bjerrum, Gloria Cordoba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Inés UrbiztondoThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark. inesurbiztondo@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2792-7952
Sandi Michele de OliveiraThe Institute for English, Germanic and Romance Studies, University of Copenhagen, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark. smo@hum.ku.dk.
Nieves Hernández-FloresThe Institute for English, Germanic and Romance Studies, University of Copenhagen, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark. nhf@hum.ku.dk.
Lidia CaballeroDr. Pedro Baliña Hospital, Public Health Ministry, 3300 Posadas, Misiones, Argentina. lidia.gladis@gmail.com.
Miguel Angel SuarezPoliclínica Central de la Caja Nacional de Salud, La Paz 1086 Bolivia. sucumian@gmail.com.
Lars BjerrumThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark. lbjerrum@sund.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-0969-0063
Gloria CordobaThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark. gloriac@sund.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-2609-0468
University of Copenhagen · DKNational University of Misiones · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of the quality improvement program “Health Alliance for Prudent Prescribing, Yield And Use of anti-microbial Drugs In the Treatment of respiratory tract infections” (HAPPY AUDIT) South America, we planned to implement an intervention based on the use of quality indicators as a means to influence General Practitioners’ (GPs) prescribing decision. Knowledge on the acceptability and applicability of an intervention is crucial to decide whether the intervention is suitable and will achieve the expected outcomes. This study explores GPs’ views about the acceptability and applicability of using quality indicators as an intervention to influence their prescribing decision in patients with suspected Respiratory Tract Infections (RTIs) across four countries in South-America. In March 2015, GPs that were participating in HAPPY AUDIT South America were invited to participate in focus groups. A discussion guide covering the domains acceptability and applicability was used. Data was analyzed through systematic text condensation with an inductive approach. 171 GPs were invited and 48% participated. Acceptability ranged from totally acceptable to slightly acceptable. This spectrum of GPs views on acceptability was influenced by themes concerning applicability. In conclusion, there is a positive attitude towards the use of quality indicators. Nonetheless, applicability challenges have to be taken into consideration and solved if we are to achieve a large effect with the implementation of this intervention.

Indexed as

antibioticsgeneral practicequality indicators

Identifiers

PMID29976893
PMCPMC6163160
OpenAlexW2395359046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.