Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29976832›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018

Noncontrast Head CT in Children: National Variation in Radiation Dose Indices in the United States.

G Sadigh, N Kadom, P Karthik, D Sengupta, K J Strauss, D Frush, K E Applegate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. The necessity of CT scans on pediatric carotid injury after blunt trauma - An analysis of the traumaregister DGUEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Radiation safety education and diagnostic imaging in pediatric patients with surgically treated hydrocephalus: the patient and family perspective.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

G SadighFrom the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (G.S., N.K.,), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia gsadigh@emory.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3233-1878
N KadomFrom the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (G.S., N.K.,), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-1591-9357
P KarthikAmerican College of Radiology (P.K., D.S.), Reston, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0002-2255-2557
D SenguptaAmerican College of Radiology (P.K., D.S.), Reston, Virginia.
K J StraussDepartment of Radiology (K.J.S.), University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-0087-976X
D FrushDepartment of Radiology (D.F.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-6928-4465
K E ApplegateDepartment of Radiology (K.E.A.), University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.ORCID 0000-0001-7716-1636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRadiologists should manage the radiation dose for pediatric patients to maintain reasonable diagnostic confidence. We assessed the variation in estimated radiation dose indices for pediatric noncontrast head CT in the United States. MATERIALS AND

methodsRadiation dose indices for single-phase noncontrast head CT examinations in patients 18 years of age and younger were retrospectively reviewed between July 2011 and June 2016 using the American College of Radiology CT Dose Index Registry. We used the reported volume CT dose index stratified by patient demographics and imaging facility characteristics.

resultsThe registry included 295,296 single-phase pediatric noncontrast head CT studies from 1571 facilities (56% in male patients and 53% in children older than 10 years of age). The median volume CT dose index was 33 mGy (interquartile range = 22-47 mGy). The volume CT dose index increased as age increased. The volume CT dose index was lower in children's hospitals (median, 26 mGy) versus academic hospitals (median, 32 mGy) and community hospitals (median, 40 mGy). There was a lower volume CT dose index in level I and II trauma centers (median, 27 and 32 mGy, respectively) versus nontrauma centers (median, 40 mGy) and facilities in metropolitan locations (median, 30 mGy) versus those in suburban and rural locations (median, 41 mGy).

conclusionsConsiderable variation in the radiation dose index for pediatric head CT exists. Median dose indices and practice variations at pediatric facilities were both lower compared with other practice settings. Decreasing dose variability through proper management of CT parameters in pediatric populations using benchmarks generated by data from registries can potentially decrease population exposure to ionizing radiation.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageAdolescentChildCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHeadHumansInfantMaleRegistriesRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29976832
PMCPMC7410540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.