Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29976593›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2018

Histopathological Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection: Does a Threshold of 23 Neutrophils Do Better than Classification of the Periprosthetic Membrane in a Prospective Multicenter Study?

Pascale Bémer, Julie Léger, Serge Milin, Chloé Plouzeau, Anne Sophie Valentin, Nathalie Stock, Anne Jolivet-Gougeon, Anne Moreau, Stéphane Corvec, Isabelle Quintin-Roue and 10 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Enhancing Diagnostics in Orthopedic Infections.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Pascale BémerDepartment of Bacteriology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France pascale.bemer@chu-nantes.fr.
Julie LégerInserm, CIC 1415, Tours, France.
Serge MilinDepartment of Anatomopathology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
Chloé PlouzeauDepartment of Bacteriology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
Anne Sophie ValentinDepartment of Bacteriology, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France.
Nathalie StockDepartment of Anatomopathology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Anne Jolivet-GougeonDepartment of Bacteriology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Anne MoreauDepartment of Anatomopathology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Stéphane CorvecDepartment of Bacteriology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3176-8111
Isabelle Quintin-RoueDepartment of Anatomopathology, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Didier TandéDepartment of Bacteriology, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Geneviève Héry-ArnaudDepartment of Bacteriology, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Marie-Christine RousseletDepartment of Anatomopathology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Carole LemariéDepartment of Bacteriology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Marie KempfDepartment of Bacteriology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Patrick MichenetDepartment of Anatomopathology, Orléans Hospital, Orléans, France.
Laurent BretDepartment of Bacteriology, Orléans Hospital, Orléans, France.
Gonzague de PinieuxDepartment of Anatomopathology, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France.
Christophe BurucoaDepartment of Bacteriology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
CRIOGO (Centre de Référence des Infections Ostéo-articulaires du Grand Ouest) Study Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No gold standard exists for histopathological diagnosis of a prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The historical criterion considers the presence of neutrophil infiltration upon examination of periprosthetic tissue. Morawietz et al. proposed a classification of periprosthetic membranes (Morawietz et al., Clin Pathol 59:591-597, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2005.027458) and a more recently described classification with a new cutoff value of 23 neutrophils in 10 high-power fields (Morawietz et al., Histopathology 54:847-853, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03313.x). We performed a multicenter prospective study, which compared both methods for the diagnosis of PJI. All suspicions of PJI (

Indexed as

Joint ProsthesisAgedArthritis, InfectiousBacteriological TechniquesBone-Implant InterfaceFemaleHumansLeukocyte CountMaleNeutrophilsProspective StudiesProsthesis-Related InfectionsSensitivity and Specificityneutrophil thresholdperiprosthetic interface membraneprosthetic joint Infection

Identifiers

PMID29976593
PMCPMC6113493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.