Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29976470›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2018

Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD): an international multicentre registry study.

Maxime J M van der Valk, Denise E Hilling, Esther Bastiaannet, Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg, Geerard L Beets, Nuno L Figueiredo, Angelita Habr-Gama, Rodrigo O Perez, Andrew G Renehan, Cornelis J H van de Velde and 1 more

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 532 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
532citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05040646 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Study Protocol - The Development of a Novel Patient Reported Outcomes Measure Committed to the Watch-and-wait Program for Rectal Cancer: An International Delphi Study Protocol

TypeobservationalSponsorMaastricht University Medical CenterRan2021 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsRectal CancerArmsDelphi exercise
NCT05338866 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Chemotherapy Combined With High-dose Radiotherapy for Low Rectal Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Guided Radiotherapy Linear Accelerator:A Prospective Phase 2 Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2022 to 2033Enrolled58ConditionsRectal CancerArmsMagnetic resonance guided radiotherapy, Chemotherapy
NCT06631443 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Clinical Outcome in Asian Patients with Localized Rectal Adenocarcinoma Managed with Watch-and-wait Approach by Developing a Multinational Collaborative Database.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorTata Memorial CentreRan2024 to 2029Enrolled337ConditionsRectal Adenocarcinoma, Rectal Cancer
NCT07404228 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Multidimensional Study Designed to Develop a Methodological Framework Based on MRI Data to Predict Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Treatment

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2026 to 2029Enrolled115ConditionsRectal Cancer, Chemoradiotherapy, MriArmsquestionnaire completion
NCT07580027 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative, Adaptive Radiotherapy Concomitant to Chemotherapy for Rectal Adenocarcinoma (Adaptive Rectal Cancer Trial 02). An Interventional Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS San RaffaeleRan2026 to 2029Enrolled33ConditionsLocally Advanced Rectal CarcinomaArmsPreoperative, adaptive radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

532 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for localized rectal cancer (2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. PET/MR Imaging of the Gastrointestinal Tract.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

472 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maxime J M van der ValkDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Denise E HillingDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Esther BastiaannetDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Elma Meershoek-Klein KranenbargDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Geerard L BeetsDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Netherlands. Electronic address: g.beets@nki.nl.
Nuno L FigueiredoColorectal Surgery, Digestive Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Angelita Habr-GamaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paolo, Brazil.
Rodrigo O PerezDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paolo, Brazil.
Andrew G RenehanManchester Cancer Research Centre, National Institute of Health and Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Cornelis J H van de VeldeDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
IWWD Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe strategy of watch and wait (W&W) in patients with rectal cancer who achieve a complete clinical response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy is new and offers an opportunity for patients to avoid major resection surgery. However, evidence is based on small-to-moderate sized series from specialist centres. The International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD) aims to describe the outcome of the W&W strategy in a large-scale registry of pooled individual patient data. We report the results of a descriptive analysis after inclusion of more than 1000 patients in the registry.

methodsParticipating centres entered data in the registry through an online, highly secured, and encrypted research data server. Data included baseline characteristics, neoadjuvant therapy, imaging protocols, incidence of local regrowth and distant metastasis, and survival status. All patients with rectal cancer in whom the standard of care (total mesorectal excision surgery) was omitted after neoadjuvant therapy were eligible to be included in the IWWD. For the present analysis, we only selected patients with no signs of residual tumour at reassessment (a cCR). We analysed the proportion of patients with local regrowth, proportion of patients with distant metastases, 5-year overall survival, and 5-year disease-specific survival.

findingsBetween April 14, 2015, and June 30, 2017, we identified 1009 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment and were managed by W&W in the database from 47 participating institutes (15 countries). We included 880 (87%) patients with a cCR. Median follow-up time was 3·3 years (95% CI 3·1-3·6). The 2-year cumulative incidence of local regrowth was 25·2% (95% CI 22·2-28·5%), 88% of all local regrowth was diagnosed in the first 2 years, and 97% of local regrowth was located in the bowel wall. Distant metastasis were diagnosed in 71 (8%) of 880 patients. 5-year overall survival was 85% (95% CI 80·9-87·7%), and 5-year disease-specific survival was 94% (91-96%).

interpretationThis dataset has the largest series of patients with rectal cancer treated with a W&W approach, consisting of approximately 50% data from previous cohort series and 50% unpublished data. Local regrowth occurs mostly in the first 2 years and in the bowel wall, emphasising the importance of endoscopic surveillance to ensure the option of deferred curative surgery. Local unsalvageable disease after W&W was rare.

fundingEuropean Registration of Cancer Care financed by European Society of Surgical Oncology, Champalimaud Foundation Lisbon, Bas Mulder Award granted by the Alpe d'Huzes Foundation and Dutch Cancer Society, and European Research Council Advanced Grant.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOutcome Assessment, Health CareRegistriesWatchful Waiting

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.