Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29976233›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2018

Gastric versus postpyloric enteral nutrition in elderly patients (age ≥ 75 years) on mechanical ventilation: a single-center randomized trial.

Youfeng Zhu, Haiyan Yin, Rui Zhang, Xiaoling Ye, Jianrui Wei

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Efficacy and safety of enteral nutrition in prone position among critically ill ventilated patients: a meta-analysis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Youfeng ZhuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510220, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6793-5511
Haiyan YinDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510220, China.
Rui ZhangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510220, China.
Xiaoling YeDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510220, China.
Jianrui WeiInstitute of Clinical Nutrition, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Medical College, Jinan University, Tongfuzhong Road No. 396, Guangzhou, 510220, China. Jianruiw@163.com.
Jinan University · CN

Funding

Academician Li Jieshou special research foundation of the intestinal barrier LJS_201406Guangzhou medical science and technology project 20151A010025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is reduced when postpyloric enteral nutrition (EN) is administered compared to when gastric EN is administered in specific populations. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that postpyloric EN is superior to gastric EN in reducing the incidence of VAP in elderly patients (age ≥ 75 years) who are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and require mechanical ventilation.

methodsWe performed a single-center randomized clinical trial involving elderly patients (age ≥ 75 years) who were admitted to the ICU and required mechanical ventilation. The patients were randomly assigned to either the postpyloric EN group or the gastric EN group. The primary outcome was the VAP rate.

resultsOf the 836 patients screened, 141 patients were included in the study (70 in the postpyloric EN group and 71 in the gastric EN group). The patients in the postpyloric EN group were 82.0 (75.0-99.0) years old (male 61.4%), and those in the gastric EN group were 82.0 (75.0-92.0) years old (male 63.4%). The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores were 28.09 ± 6.75 in the postpyloric EN group and 27.80 ± 7.60 in the gastric EN group (P = 0.43). VAP was observed in 8 of 70 patients (11.4%) in the postpyloric EN group and in 18 of 71 patients (25.4%) in the gastric EN group, which resulted in a significant between-group difference (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-0.94; P = 0.04). In the postpyloric EN group, there were significant reductions in vomiting (12 patients in the postpyloric EN group vs 29 patients in the gastric EN group; OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.65; P = 0.002) and abdominal distension (18 patients in the postpyloric EN group vs 33 patients in the gastric EN group; OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.81; P = 0.01). No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding mortality and other secondary outcomes.

conclusionsOur study demonstrated that, compared with gastric EN, postpyloric EN reduced the VAP rate among elderly patients who were admitted to the ICU and required mechanical ventilation.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-IPR-16008485 . Registered on 17 May 2016.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAPACHEChinaEnteral NutritionFemaleGeriatricsHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleOrgan Dysfunction ScoresPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedRespiration, ArtificialElderly patientsGastric enteral nutritionMechanical ventilationPostpyloric enteral nutritionVentilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID29976233
PMCPMC6034338
OpenAlexW2809859963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.